Solve a PDE with Separation of Variables

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the 2-D time-independent Schrödinger equation with a potential V(x,y) = 0 using the method of separation of variables. The equation is transformed into a form that allows separation into two second-order ordinary differential equations (ODEs) for X(x) and Y(y). The key insight is that the separation constant E influences the signs of k²x and k²y, which are derived from the relationship k²x + k²y = k². Understanding the boundary conditions and the physical context, such as whether the problem involves a 2D well or a free particle, is crucial for determining valid solutions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with the Schrödinger equation and its physical implications
  • Knowledge of ordinary differential equations (ODEs) and their solutions
  • Basic concepts of boundary conditions in quantum mechanics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in depth
  • Learn about the Helmholtz equation and its applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore boundary value problems and their significance in solving PDEs
  • Investigate the physical interpretations of energy levels in quantum systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and mathematical methods for solving differential equations. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of the Schrödinger equation and its applications in various physical scenarios.

Battlemage!
Messages
292
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement



Solve the 2-D time-independent Schrödinger equation with V (x,y) = 0:



Homework Equations





2/2m ( ∂2Ψ(x,y)/∂x2 + ∂2Ψ(x,y)/∂y2 ) = EΨ(x,y)​



The Attempt at a Solution



I started by getting -ћ2/2m to one side:


( ∂2Ψ(x,y)/∂x2 + ∂2Ψ(x,y)/∂y2 ) = -2mE/ћ2 Ψ(x,y)​


Here is my problem: I'm not sure what to do with everything on the right side of the = sign.

What follows is my misguided attempt at a solution:




I assumed a solution of the form


Ψ(x,y) = X(x)Y(y)​


Then I substituted this in for Ψ(x,y), giving:



Y(y) d2X(x)/dx2 + X(x) d2Y(y)/dy2 = -2mE/ћ2 X(x)Y(y)​



Then I divided both sides by X(x)Y(y):



1/X(x) d2X(x)/dx2 + 1/Y(y) d2Y(y)/dy2 = -2mE/ћ2


And here is where I hit the road block. If the two 2nd order ODEs are equal to a constant, then it is pretty obvious that since they add together to get -2mE/ћ2
and are equal to each other, then the constant they are equal to has to be -mE/ћ2. I can't really see how to solve those ODEs. I mean, I can't just use the auxilery equation, because that would be m2 = 0, which would give me two solutions of zero. Obviously I am missing something pretty important here.

Any insight would be much appreciated. Please keep in mind that this is very new to me, and any explanations will have to be pretty elementary if I am to understand.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must have solved an equation like X''(x)=C*X(x) before. Because that's what you've got. I think the general solution can be expressed as the sum of exponential functions. Or if C is negative, sin's and cos's.
 
Your are thinking about the Laplace equation:

\nabla^{2} \Psi= 0

The time-independent Schrödinger is what is called the Helmoltz equation:

(\nabla^{2} - k^{2})\Psi= 0

where k^{2}= \frac{-2mE}{h^{2}}

What you have is fine, so let's just define

\frac{X''}{X}=k^{2}_{x}

and

\frac{Y''}{Y}=k^{2}_{y}

So, k^{2}_{x} + k^{2}_{y}=k^{2}

You solve like you normally do. At this point you cannot say what k^{2}_{x} and k^{2}_{y} actually are.
But the value of E will determine the sign of k^{2}. This in turn gives the signs of gives the sign of k^{2}_{x} and k^{2}_{y} from our relationship.

One of the values of E is allowed, while that other is not. This depends on the physics of the problem: boundary conditions, initial conditions, unbounded variables, finiteness, etc. Also, k^{2}_{x} and [k^{2}_{y}] depend on the physics.

Like, is this a 2D Well or a Free Particle? The solutions are very similar and use the PDE you mentioned.

If you haven't notice yet, E is the separation constant between the spatial and time parts of the Schrödinger Eq.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K