Solve Algebra Question: radical{n+4} + radical{n-1}=5

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter redshadow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the algebraic equation radical{n+4} + radical{n-1}=5. Participants explore various methods for isolating the radicals and simplifying the equation, focusing on algebraic manipulation techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses uncertainty about how to begin solving the equation and suggests squaring the entire expression.
  • Another participant proposes multiplying both sides by the conjugate of the left side to simplify the equation, referencing the difference of squares formula.
  • A different approach is suggested to isolate one radical and square both sides, leading to a simpler equation without radicals.
  • One participant critiques the conjugate method, stating it does not simplify the expression effectively and endorses another method instead.
  • Another participant outlines a method involving defining variables for the radicals and forming a system of equations to solve for n.
  • There are inquiries about extending the discussed methods to equations with three radicals, indicating a potential complexity in finding conjugates for such cases.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing methods for solving the equation, with no consensus on a single preferred approach. Some methods are critiqued while others are endorsed, indicating a variety of perspectives on the best strategy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the effectiveness of certain methods may depend on the specific structure of the equation, and there is acknowledgment of the potential for different outcomes based on the chosen approach.

Who May Find This Useful

Students or individuals seeking assistance with algebraic equations involving radicals, particularly those interested in exploring various solving techniques.

redshadow
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Greetings guys!

I'm having a bit of trouble with an equation right now, I know the answer is 5, however, the steps I have to take to get there are pretty uncertain to me. Any help would be awesome.

radical{n+4} + radical{n-1}=5.


I need to know where to start. Impulse tells me to square the whole thing...but that doesn't seem to be working for me.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Impulse takes me to multiply both sides by [tex]\left(\sqrt{n+4} - \sqrt{n-1}\right)[/tex], the "conjugate" of the left side. This is very common practice when dealing with square roots. Remember the difference of squares formula? That's the idea here.
 
Right now you have two radicals on the left side. Square both sides, and you'll only have one radical on the left side. Isolate it, and square both sides again. Your equation will now be free of radicals.
 
Moo Of Doom said:
Impulse takes me to multiply both sides by [tex]\left(\sqrt{n+4} - \sqrt{n-1}\right)[/tex], the "conjugate" of the left side. This is very common practice when dealing with square roots. Remember the difference of squares formula? That's the idea here.
The problem is that doesn't simplify it down, you still end up with the sum of two square roots in your expression. AKG's method is the way to go.
 
Actually, I would have done it slightly different from AKG's method:
First remove one radical to the right side:
[tex]\sqrt{n+4}= 5- \sqrt{n-1}[/tex]
Now square both sides:
[tex]n+ 4= 25- 10\sqrt{n-1}+ n-1[/tex]
Now the "n"s happen to cancel. Get the square root by itself on the left:
[tex]10\sqrt{n-1}= 20[/tex]
or
[tex]\sqrt{n-1}= 2[/tex]
Squaring that gives a simple equation for n.

(If the coefficients of "n" in the orginal equation had not been the same, the "n"s would not cancel after the first squaring. Then the final equation would be quadratic rather than linear.)
 
AlphaNumeric said:
The problem is that doesn't simplify it down, you still end up with the sum of two square roots in your expression. AKG's method is the way to go.

HOI's, and AKG's approach are the common ones, however, you can also try out what Moo of Doom suggested.
Let [tex]I = \sqrt{n + 4} \quad \mbox{and} \quad J = \sqrt{n - 1}[/tex] (note that: I, J >= 0)
We have:

[tex]\sqrt{n + 4} + \sqrt{n - 1} = I + J = 5[/tex] (as the problem stated)

Now, if you multiply both sides with the conjugate of [tex]\sqrt{n + 4} + \sqrt{n - 1}[/tex], we'll obtain another equation:

[tex](\sqrt{n + 4} + \sqrt{n - 1}) (\sqrt{n + 4} - \sqrt{n - 1}) = 5 ( \sqrt{n + 4} - \sqrt{n - 1} )[/tex]

[tex]\Leftrightarrow 5 = 5 ( \sqrt{n + 4} - \sqrt{n - 1} )[/tex]

[tex]\Leftrightarrow 1 = 1 ( \sqrt{n + 4} - \sqrt{n - 1} ) = I - J[/tex]

Now, you have the system of equations:
[tex]\left\{ \begin{array}{l} I + J = 5 \\ I - J = 1 \end{array} \right.[/tex]
Solve the system above for I, and J, then from there, you can find n. :)
 
Viet how would you use this method if you have 3 radicals.
 
minase said:
Viet how would you use this method if you have 3 radicals.

Like I said, it's not a common way. You can use it, but HOI's or AKG's approach may be more familiar. In a 3 radicals problem, you'll have 3 equations, and 3 unknowns (i.e 3 radicals).
 
But how can you find the tree equations is there any way to find the conjugates of 3 radicals.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K