Solve Complex Number Equation: z^2+4z ̅+4=0 | Expert Help Available

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
11 replies · 4K views
ronho1234
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
find all the solutions to z^2+4z ̅+4=0 where z is a complex number.
 
on Phys.org
i think I'm getting confused so is the answer for z=2 or do i have to represent it as complex 2isquared? because the question asks for all solution so i don't think 2 is right... and what does the bar on top of the z mean?
 
ronho1234 said:
i think I'm getting confused so is the answer for z=2 or do i have to represent it as complex 2isquared? because the question asks for all solution so i don't think 2 is right... and what does the bar on top of the z mean?

Oh I see, so you were trying to solve [itex]z^2+4\overline{z}+4=0[/itex] then? Because in your OP I'm just seeing a box that is being replaced by whatever you wanted to write down.

If it's just [itex]z^2+4z+4[/itex] then you can simply factorize it into [itex](z+2)^2=0[/itex] which would give you the answer of z=-2, but this can't be right because the question already stated that z is a complex number (imaginary part is not 0 by assumption).

If it's [itex]z^2+4\overline{z}+4=0[/itex] then you'll need to use the fact that [itex]z=a+ib[/itex] and [itex]\overline{z}=a-ib[/itex] and plug these values into the expression and then simplify and equate the real and imaginary parts.
What I mean by equating them is if you end up with something like [itex]ab+2+(a-1)i=0[/itex] then what you can take away from this is that [itex]ab+2=0[/itex] and [itex]a-1=0[/itex] because the LHS is equal to the RHS thus the real part on the LHS is equal to 0 on the RHS, and the imaginary part on the LHS is equal to the imaginary part on the RHS (the RHS is equal to 0+0i).
 
so i partially understand what you have
so i did something like this:
z = a+ib and zbar=a-ib
because i split them like you said (z+2i)(z-2i)=0
so i made a+ib=z+2 and a-ib=zbar+2
so z=a+ib-2 and zbar=a-ib-2
i put these back into th eqn (a+ib-2)squared +4(a-ib-2)+4=0
then i expand and simplify i get a squared+2aib-8ib-b-4=0
and so (a squared -b-4)+2i(ab-4b)=0?
then a squared -b=4 and ab=4b
so a=4 and b=12?
then so i get z=4+12i and zbar=4-12i ?
i don't get why we have to split it as z and zbar...
 
Whew that was a tough one to follow.

ronho1234 said:
so i did something like this:
z = a+ib and zbar=a-ib
because i split them like you said (z+2i)(z-2i)=0

Ok stop right there. Where did I say to "split them" as such? If [itex]z=a+ib[/itex] and [itex]\overline{z}=a-ib[/itex] then substituting these values into

[tex]z^2+4\overline{z}+4=0[/tex]

gives us

[tex](a+ib)^2+4(a-ib)+4=0[/tex]

Now expand, simplify, and collect the real and imaginary parts and equate them.
 
i reread your explanation and redid it
so what i did was sub a+ib and a-ib straight into z^2+4zbar+4=0
and i got a squared -b squared +4 + 4a +2bi(a-2) = o
and then a-2=0 a=2 and a squared -b squared +4+4a=0
and i get a=2 and b=+/-4
do i sub these back into z and z bar or something?
 
so my solutions are: z=2+4i and z=2-4i??
 
ronho1234 said:
i reread your explanation and redid it
so what i did was sub a+ib and a-ib straight into z^2+4zbar+4=0
and i got a squared -b squared +4 + 4a +2bi(a-2) = o

So far so good.

and then a-2=0 a=2

OR b=0.

That's also a valid solution.

and a squared -b squared +4+4a=0
and i get a=2 and b=+/-4
do i sub these back into z and z bar or something?

When you sub b=0 back into this, you get a2 + 4a + 4=0, which will give you a=-2, b=0; the only real solution z=-2 which I mentioned in my last post.

So there are three solutions in total.
 
yep... so my solutions are z=2+4i, z=2-4i and z=-2
thankyou!
 
In the future use punctuation and be neater so people can help you easily!