Solve Electrostatic Force Problem

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the electrostatic force between two charged particles and determining the position of a third charge such that the net force on it is zero. The charges are given with specific coordinates in the xy-plane, and the task includes finding both the magnitude and direction of the force, as well as the coordinates for the third charge.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply Coulomb's Law to find the forces acting on the charges and is exploring the conditions under which the net force on the third charge is zero. They express confusion about how to determine the coordinates for the third charge based on their calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on how to find the coordinates for the third charge by suggesting the use of unit vectors and vector addition. However, the original poster expresses difficulty in understanding these concepts and how they apply to their specific problem.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that they have two unknowns but only one equation, leading to a challenge in finding a solution. They also mention the need to place the third charge along the line of force between the first two charges.

PFStudent
Messages
169
Reaction score
0
TITLE: Hard Electric Charge Problem.

Homework Statement



15. The charges and coordinates of two charged particles held fixed in an xy plane are q_{1} = +3.0 \muC, x_{1} = 3.5 cm, y_{1} = 0.50 cm, and q_{2} = -4.0 \muC, x_{2} = -2.0 cm, y_{2} = 1.5 cm. Find the
(a) magnitude and
(b) direction of the electrostatic force on particle 2 due to particle 1. At what
(c) x and
(d) y coordinates should a third particle of charge q_{3} = +4.0 \muC be placed such that the net electrostatic force on particle 3 due to particle 1 and 2 is zero.

Homework Equations



Coulomb's Law:

Vector Form:

<br /> \vec{F}_{12} = \frac{k_{e}q_{1}q_{2}}{{r_{12}}^2}\hat{r}_{21}<br />

Scalar Form:

<br /> |\vec{F}_{12}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{{r_{12}}^2}<br />

The Attempt at a Solution



q_{1} = +3.0 \muC

x_{1} = 3.5 cm

y_{1} = 0.50 cm

q_{2} = -4.0 \muC

x_{2} = -2.0 cm

y_{2} = 1.5 cm

q_{3} = +4.0 \muC

x_{3} = ?

y_{3} = ?

(a)

<br /> |\vec{F}_{21}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{{r_{21}}^2}<br />

r_{21} = \sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+((y_{2}-y_{1})^2}

<br /> |\vec{F}_{21}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{(\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+((y_{2}-y_{1})^2})^2}<br />

<br /> |\vec{F}_{21}| = \frac{k_{e}|q_{1}||q_{2}|}{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+((y_{2}-y_{1})^2}<br />

<br /> sig. fig. \equiv 2<br />

<br /> |\vec{F}_{21}| = 35{\textcolor[rgb]{1.00,1.00,1.00}{.}}N<br />

(b)

<br /> tan\theta = \frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}<br />

<br /> \theta = arctan\left(\frac{y_{2}-y_{1}}{x_{2}-x_{1}}\right)<br />

<br /> sig. fig. \equiv 2<br />

\theta = -10 degrees

\theta = 3.5 x 10 degrees or 6.1 rad.

(c) and (d)

Ok, here is where I am stuck. I can’t find the (x_{3}, y_{3}) such that the net force on q_{3} will be zero.

So here is how I approach these parts.

\Sigma \vec{F}_{3} = 0

0 = \vec{F}_{31} + \vec{F}_{32}

-\vec{F}_{31} = \vec{F}_{32}

|\vec{F}_{31}| = |\vec{F}_{32}|

<br /> \frac{k_{e}|q_{3}||q_{1}|}{{r_{31}}^2} = \frac{k_{e}|q_{3}||q_{2}|}{{r_{32}}^2}<br />

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{|q_{2}|} = \frac{{r_{31}}^2}{{r_{32}}^2}<br />

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{|q_{2}|} = \frac{(\sqrt{(x_{3}-x_{1})^2 + (y_{3}-y_{1})^2})^2}{(\sqrt{(x_{3}-x_{2})^2+ (y_{3}-y_{2})^2})^2}<br />

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{|q_{2}|} = \frac{(x_{3}-x_{1})^2 + (y_{3}-y_{1})^2}{(x_{3}-x_{2})^2+ (y_{3}-y_{2})^2}<br />

Two unknowns, one equation…, so then I figured that q_{3} can only be placed on the line of force through q_{1} and q_{2}.

The line of force is the imaginary axis (line) through q_{1} and q_{2}.

Therefore, we essentially have a simple single axis problem where we need to find where on the same axis a charge q_{3} can be placed such that the force on it due to q_{1} and q_{2} is zero.

In solving this problem, I referred to the following principle,
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Given any two arbitrary un-like sign charges: q_{1} and q_{2}, placed on an x-axis a distance L from each other. Then, the placement (on the x-axis) of a charge q_{3} such that the net force on q_{3} due to: q_{1} and q_{2}, will be zero. Can be given as follows,

q_{1}q_{2} &lt; 0 \therefore q_{1}q_{2} \equiv -

<br /> |q_{1}| &lt; |q_{2}|, |\vec{r}_{31}| &lt; |\vec{r}_{32}|, |\vec{r}_{32}| &gt; L<br />

<br /> |q_{1}| = |q_{2}|<br />, No equilibrium exists on x-axis.

<br /> |q_{1}| &gt; |q_{2}|, |\vec{r}_{31}| &gt; |\vec{r}_{32}|, |\vec{r}_{32}| &gt; L<br />
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------

<br /> |q_{1}| &lt; |q_{2}|<br />

Then,

<br /> |\vec{r}_{31}| &lt; |\vec{r}_{32}|<br />

Where,

<br /> |\vec{r}_{32}| &gt; L<br />

Therefore, the charge q_{3} must be placed (on the line of force) to the right of q_{3}. We then let the distance between,

q_{1} and q_{3} = c

Now, going back to the original relationship,

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{{r_{31}}^2} = \frac{|q_{2}|}{{r_{32}}^2}<br />

Now noting that: r_{31} = c and r_{32} = r_{12} + c

Then,

<br /> \frac{|q_{1}|}{{(c)}^2} = \frac{|q_{2}|}{{(r_{12} + c)}^2}<br />

Then, through some algebra the following result is arrived,

<br /> c = \frac{r_{12}}{\pm \sqrt{\frac{|q_{2}|}{|q_{1}|}-1}}<br />

Since, r_{12} \equiv distance r from 1 to 2.

Then,

<br /> r_{12} = \sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+(y_{2}-y_{1})^2}<br />

Substituting,

<br /> c = \frac{\sqrt{(x_{2}-x_{1})^2+(y_{2}-y_{1})^2}}{\pm \sqrt{\frac{|q_{2}|}{|q_{1}|}-1}}<br />

Letting, (for convenience) sig. fig. \equiv 4,

c = 0.3614 m, -0.024 m

Note: Real distance cannot be negative, therefore,

c = 0.3614 m

Ok, so I am now stuck, how am I supposed to use this distance, c to find the coordinates: x_{3} and y_{3}?

Any help would be appreciated. :)

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your logic is impeccable and the c is correct. To find a position c away from P1 in the direction pointed to by P1-P2, form a vector c*(P1-P2)/sqrt((P1-P2)^2) and add it to P1. Do you see how that works? It's c times a unit vector pointing the correct direction added to the initial position.
 
Last edited:
Dick said:
Your logic is impeccable and the c is correct. To find a position c away from P1 in the direction pointed to by P1-P2, form a vector c*(P1-P2)/sqrt((P1-P2)^2) and add it to P1. Do you see how that works? It's c times a unit vector pointing the correct direction added to the initial position.

Hey,

Thanks for the information, I looked over what you suggested and I couldn't quite, understand what you were trying to say.

So far, this is as much as I could gather, that given a distance,

<br /> r_{13} = c<br />

How is it that I construct a unit vector pointing in the correct direction and add that to the initial position? How do I do that? How does that lead me to to the coordinates,

<br /> (x_{3}, y_{3})?<br />

As far as the distance vector for q_{1} to q_{3}, isn't that the following,

<br /> \vec{r}_{13} = x_{3}\hat{i}-y_{3}\hat{j}<br />

I don't understand how this helps, me solve for (x_{3}, y_{3}).

Thanks for the help, any more information is appreciated.

Thanks,

-PFStudent
 
Last edited:
Ok. P1=(x1,y1), P2=(x2,y2). P1-P2=(x1-x2,y1-y2) is a vector that points in the direction from P2 towards P1. It has length L=sqrt((x1-x2)^2+(y1-y2)^2) (the distance between P1 and P2). So (P1-P2)/L points in the same direction and has length 1 (its a unit vector). So c*(P1-P2)/L points in the same direction and has length c. So P1+c*(P2-P1)/L lies along the line between P2 and P1 but c units outside of the interval between P1 and P2 and nearest to P1. And I think that's what you want.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
896
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K