Solve for q Value in F Distribution with Degrees of Freedom 1 & 2

  • Thread starter Thread starter rhyno89
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the q value in the context of an F distribution derived from independent chi-square random variables. The original poster presents a scenario involving two chi-square random variables, X with 1 degree of freedom and Y with 2 degrees of freedom, and a transformation leading to a new variable W.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between chi-square distributions and the F distribution, questioning the impact of the multiplicative factor in the transformation. Some suggest considering a new random variable Z derived from 3X to simplify the problem. Others discuss the additive property of chi-square distributions and its applicability in this context.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing insights and clarifying concepts related to the transformation of random variables. Some guidance has been offered regarding the properties of the F distribution and how to approach the problem, but no consensus has been reached on the final method to solve for q.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the problem, particularly regarding the correct interpretation of the transformation involving the factor of 3 and the degrees of freedom associated with the chi-square variables. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these transformations on the resulting F distribution.

rhyno89
Messages
18
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If X and Y are independent chi square random variables with degrees of freedom of 1 and 2 respectively, then W = 3X/Y with P(W >= q) .25 holds for what q value

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



So I know that the result of two chi square distributions with one being divided into another results in an F distribution. Where I am getting really confused is with the factor of 3 before the X random variable. My guess was to set it up as P(3F1,2 >= q) = .25 For the time being I just figured it out as 1-P(F1,2 <= q) since the values on the table are cummulative to find the q value. At this point I jus multiplied it by 3 to account for the multiplicative factor but that seems too easy and does not make much since.

On a side note how do I know whether or not the F statistic is 3X/Y or Y/3X

Thanks a lot fellas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
why not start by considering the RV, Z = 3X? Then once you get your head around Z, you can consider W = Z/Y
 
since there is an additive property with independent chi square distributions...could i treat the 3X as simply X+X+X and get a chi square random variable with 3 degrees of freedom?
 
rhyno89 said:
since there is an additive property with independent chi square distributions...could i treat the 3X as simply X+X+X and get a chi square random variable with 3 degrees of freedom?

Do you actually have 3 degrees of freedom?
 
Ok i understand that part...i can't use the additive property because I am not adding three different independent random variables, I am merely multiplying the one that I do have by 3.

Since I can't use 3 df i have to still use the 1 and 2 respectively. It seems that a logical attempt would be to actually write out the pdf of a chi square df 1 and multiply it by 3 and divide it by the pdf of the chi square of df 2 would be one way to get the F distribution and solve it. I did not want to go this route because it seemed that there was a theorem or definition that would deal with a chi square RV transformation
 
that sounds like a good idea, so how about this... consider the variable Z = (X/1)/(Y/2) = X/(2Y), then Z has an F(1,2) distribution, see following
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-distribution

then W = 6 Z = 3X/Y

so P(W>=q) = 0.25 is equivalent to P(Z>=q/6)
 
ok thanks that makes a lot of sense... i think that is similar to what i initially tried to do and just got confused along the way...

my only question about that is what property of the F distribution results in being able to rewrite X with df 1 / Y with df 2 as X/2Y and since u can do that is that saying that similarly if Y had 4 df u could rewrite it as X/4Y?
 
have a look at the wiki page, if you have two chi square variables with degrees of freedom

X - dfX
Y - dfY

The following RV will have a an F(dfX, dfY) distribution
Z = (X/dfX)/(Y/dfY)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K