Solve for x: Log (x+5)= Log x + Log 5

  • Thread starter Thread starter lLovePhysics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the equation log(x+5) = log x + log 5, which involves properties of logarithms. Participants explore the implications of manipulating logarithmic expressions and the rules governing logarithmic equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of eliminating logarithms by exponentiating both sides of the equation and question whether this rule applies universally to logarithmic operations. There are also inquiries about the necessity of applying the same operation to both sides of an equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their reasoning and questioning assumptions about logarithmic properties. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of functions to both sides of an equation, but no consensus has been reached on the specific problem at hand.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference additional problems involving logarithms, indicating a broader context of exploring logarithmic identities and properties, but the specific constraints of the original problem remain under discussion.

lLovePhysics
Messages
169
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve for x: log(x+5)= log x + log 5.


Homework Equations


log a + log b = log (ab)


The Attempt at a Solution



log (x+5)= log (5x)

x+5= 5x

4x=5

x=5/4


However, my question is: When you make the logs to the power of 10, to eliminate them, do you always need to do it to BOTH sides? Does that rule imply for any log? For example, if you want to log a number, do you need to do it to both sides? Do these kind of procedures all work the same as "Whatever you do to one side of the equation, you must do to the other?"
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Another problem that I've done:

Problem: Evaluate [tex]log_{27}\sqrt{54}-log_{27}\sqrt{6}[/tex]

Solved by: [tex]log_{27}\sqrt{9}=log_{27}3=x[/tex]

[tex]27^{x}=3[/tex]

[tex]3^{3x}=3^{1}[/tex]

Now, are you supposed to log both sides? to get 3x=1? Is that the correct way to do it?
 
lLovePhysics said:

Homework Statement


Solve for x: log(x+5)= log x + log 5.

Homework Equations


log a + log b = log (ab)

The Attempt at a Solution



log (x+5)= log (5x)

x+5= 5x

4x=5

x=5/4However, my question is: When you make the logs to the power of 10, to eliminate them, do you always need to do it to BOTH sides?
yes, if you want the equation to remain true.

Does that rule imply for any log? For example, if you want to log a number, do you need to do it to both sides? Do these kind of procedures all work the same as "Whatever you do to one side of the equation, you must do to the other?"
Basically, yes...

If I have an equation like
[tex] A=B[/tex]
this is saying that A is the same thing as B--they are both the same number (let's say they are both equal to 4).

Let's say that I now do something to A, for example, take the positive square-root of it. So now I have a different number sqrt(A) which is typically different from A, right? Yes. 4 is different from 2. But that means sqrt(A) is different from B since I already know that A and B are the same and both are thus different from sqrt(A).

But if I take the number B (which is the same as A) and do the same thing to it, for example, take the positive square-root, then I have a number sqrt(B) which is not the same as A or B, but is the same as sqrt(A).

So, yes, in general, if I put both sides of an equation through the exact same meat grinder--any type of meat grinder whatsoever--I still get an equation out the other end. In symbols:

[tex] A=B[/tex]
Implies
[tex] f(A)=f(B)[/tex]
where f is any function whatsoever.

Cheers.
 
lLovePhysics said:
Another problem that I've done:

Problem: Evaluate [tex]log_{27}\sqrt{54}-log_{27}\sqrt{6}[/tex]

Solved by: [tex]log_{27}\sqrt{9}=log_{27}3=x[/tex]

[tex]27^{x}=3[/tex]

[tex]3^{3x}=3^{1}[/tex]

Now, are you supposed to log both sides? to get 3x=1? Is that the correct way to do it?

yep. here's another way to see that you are correct using the fact that
[tex]\log_{27}(27)=1[/tex] and the fact that 3^3=27, and the fact that (maybe you haven't seen this yet, but it's true) [tex]\log(a^b)=b \log(a)[/tex]:

Since 3^3=27 we also have 3=27^(1/3) thus

[tex] \log_{27}(3)=\log_{27}(27^{(1/3)})=(1/3)\log_{27}(27)=(1/3)[/tex]
 
Last edited:
P.S. in tex if you use "\log" instead of "log" you will get a log symbol that looks nicer.
 
olgranpappy said:
P.S. in tex if you use "\log" instead of "log" you will get a log symbol that looks nicer.

Wow, thanks for all your help! =] Let me try [tex]\log_{27}3[/tex]
 
looks nice.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K