Solve for x: Logarithmic Equation with Multiple Terms - Step by Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter nikita33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Log
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the logarithmic equation log x² + log x - log 2.7 = log 10. Participants clarify that the correct approach involves combining logarithmic terms using properties such as log(a) + log(b) = log(ab). The solution progresses to 3 log x = log 27, leading to the conclusion that x = 27^(1/3) = 3. Misinterpretations of logarithmic properties were addressed, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying logarithmic identities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logarithmic properties, specifically log(a) + log(b) = log(ab)
  • Knowledge of how to manipulate logarithmic equations
  • Familiarity with the concept of logarithmic bases
  • Basic algebra skills for solving equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study logarithmic identities and their applications in equations
  • Practice solving logarithmic equations with multiple terms
  • Learn about the properties of exponents in relation to logarithms
  • Explore advanced logarithmic functions and their graphs
USEFUL FOR

Students studying algebra, particularly those tackling logarithmic equations, educators teaching logarithmic concepts, and anyone seeking to enhance their problem-solving skills in mathematics.

nikita33
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



log x2 + log x - log 2.7 = log 10
solve for x

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


this one i really don't know how to do. I can't find any examples, but this is what i tried (youre going to be like, what? but i had to attempt it.) I think when logs are in addition format, youre supposed to multiply them? does that make sense? i really need help on this one. :

2 log x + log x = log 10 + log 2.7
2 log x2 = log 27
4 log x = log 27

thats as far as i can get. i know its wrong. even one step in the right direction would help me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, 2*log(x)+log(x) IS NOT 2*log(x^2). 2*log(x)+log(x)=3*log(x)=log(27). Try it from there. Or do log(x^2)+log(x)=log(x^3)=log(27).
 
Last edited:
^
i had it that way the first time. i think i changed it because i got

3 log x = log 27
then to solve for x i got something that looks like this:

x = log 27/3 log

3 log? is it supposed to be 3 log 1?

if so, the answer is 0. i put 0 on my exam, although i set it up incorrectly. my prof would give a point for the correct answer and i got no points, so i don't think that's the answer.
 
"3 log" makes no sense. Go back a step to 3 log x = log 27.

What's another way to write 3 log x?
 
3*log(x)=log(x^3), doesn't it? 3log(x) is not 3*log*x. That's just plain silly, as Mark44 points out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
38
Views
6K