Solve Hydrostatic Force w/ Triangle Plate - Math Homework

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The hydrostatic force against a submerged triangular plate with a height of 6 ft and a base of 8 ft is calculated using the integral F = ∫₃⁹ 62.5 (8/6)(9 - x)x dx. The weight density of fresh water, 62.5 lb/ft³, represents the product of density (ρ) and gravitational acceleration (g). The limits of integration must reflect the submerged portion of the triangle, specifically from 3 ft to 9 ft below the water surface. Adjustments to the width expression are necessary to ensure accurate calculations of the hydrostatic force.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrostatic pressure and its formula p = ρg h
  • Familiarity with integral calculus and its application in physics
  • Knowledge of triangular geometry and submerged surfaces
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of hydrostatic pressure equations in fluid mechanics
  • Learn about the application of integrals in calculating forces on submerged surfaces
  • Explore examples of hydrostatic force calculations for various shapes
  • Review the principles of buoyancy and their relation to submerged objects
USEFUL FOR

Students in engineering and physics, particularly those studying fluid mechanics, as well as educators seeking to enhance their understanding of hydrostatic forces on submerged geometries.

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,447
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


A triangular plate with height 6 ft and a base of 8 ft is submerged vertically in water so that the top is 3 ft below the surface. Express the hydrostatic force against one side of the plate as an integral and evaluate it. (Recall that the weight density of water is 62.5 lb/ft3.)


Homework Equations



hydrostatic pressure is p = \rho g h

The Attempt at a Solution


The hydrostatic force is the pressure times the area of the surface that is submerged

the width of the triangle is solved using the following ratio:
\frac{w}{8}=\frac{9-x}{6}

w = \frac{8}{6} (9-x)

The force is then given by:

\int_{3}^{9} \rho g \frac{8}{6} (9-x)

Are the upper and lower bounds of the integral correct?
In this question the weight density is given in lb/ft^3 - does this value replace the value of rho in the above equation or does it represent rho times g?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The weight density of fresh water is 62.5 lb force / ft^3. This value represents rho*g.

You don't explicitly define x. Your integral has an expression for the width of the triangle (which I would check again), but it lacks dx.

I would check to see if your relation for the width gives zero width for depths from 0 to 3 feet. If this relation is in error, I suggest a change in the limits of integration to match the depths of the base and apex of the triangle.
 
Your integral is also missing h to convert rho*g to a pressure.
 
SteamKing said:
The weight density of fresh water is 62.5 lb force / ft^3. This value represents rho*g.

You don't explicitly define x. Your integral has an expression for the width of the triangle (which I would check again), but it lacks dx.

I would check to see if your relation for the width gives zero width for depths from 0 to 3 feet. If this relation is in error, I suggest a change in the limits of integration to match the depths of the base and apex of the triangle.

SteamKing said:
Your integral is also missing h to convert rho*g to a pressure.

Thank you for your help. Based on what you've told, I correct the integral to this:

F = \int_{3}^{9} \rho g \frac{8}{6}\left( 9 - x \right) x dx

How does this look?
 
Since the apex of the triangle is submerged, there can be no additional area from a depth of 3 feet to 0 feet. Your expression for the width of the triangle needs some adjustment to account for this.
 
SteamKing said:
Since the apex of the triangle is submerged, there can be no additional area from a depth of 3 feet to 0 feet. Your expression for the width of the triangle needs some adjustment to account for this.

Does this mean that the 9 - x should be actually 6 - x?

From the question, the triangle is inverted and submerged 3 ft under water... wouldn't the force be from 0 depth to 9 ddepth??
 
Last edited:
I think you need to take a moment and make a sketch of the problem.

The bottom of the triangle is 9 feet below the surface, and the top is 3 feet below.
From 3 feet below to the surface, there is no triangle, so the width is zero.

If x is going to be your overall depth measured from the surface, then the vertical position relative to the base of the triangle must be the depth minus 3 feet. The depth is required to determine hydrostatic pressure, but the depth coordinate must be modified when determining position between the base and the top of the triangle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K