Solve Magnetic Field from Perpendicular Wires Carrying Same Current

  • Thread starter Thread starter NotaPhysicsMan
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the net magnetic field at point P due to two perpendicular wires carrying the same current of 85.0 A. The magnetic field is determined using the formula B = μ₀I / (2πR), where R is the distance from the wires to point P, set at 0.150 m. The net magnetic field at point P is calculated to be 1.96 x 10^-4 T directed downwards, with the horizontal components canceling out due to symmetry. The correct angle to use in calculations is 60 degrees, derived from the geometry of the equilateral triangle formed by the wires and point P.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic fields generated by current-carrying wires
  • Familiarity with the Biot-Savart Law and its application
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions, specifically cosine and sine
  • Ability to analyze geometric relationships in equilateral triangles
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Biot-Savart Law for detailed magnetic field calculations
  • Learn about the right-hand rule for determining magnetic field direction
  • Explore the effects of multiple current-carrying wires on magnetic fields
  • Investigate applications of magnetic fields in engineering and physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, electrical engineering, and anyone interested in understanding magnetic fields generated by current-carrying conductors.

NotaPhysicsMan
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Ok, since I got little feedback, I will try it again, but please help. It's due tomorrow! :frown:

The drawing (attachment) shows two wires that carry the same current of I=85.0 A are are oriented perpendicular to the plane of the paper. The current in one wire is directed out of the paper, while the current in the other is directed into the paper. Find the magnitude and direction of thenet magnetic field at point P.

For those who can't get the attacment, the drawing is simple:

Code:
    P

X       0
A equilateral triangle with sides of 0.150 m, X being current into and 0 being out of.

Ok it seems that I just have to use: B=uI/2pieR to get the magnitude of the diagonal.

Using the right hand rules I draw two circlular fields reaching point P sort of like venn diagrams. Ok the radius is really just the distance from the currents to the P, so R=0.150m.

B=4pie x 10^-7 (85.0A)/ 2pie (0.150m)
B=1.133x10^-4 T.

Next:

I have two right angle triangles split in half, with the x-directions cancelling each other and the y-direction adding together going downwards. Ok so each of the angles will give 60/2=30. So 1.133x10^-4 T(cos30)=9.812x10^-5T for the y and for x=5.665x10^-5 T. X's will cancel. And for Y's or the net magnetic field is:

(2 x 9.812x10^-5T)=1.96x10^-4 T downwards?

Ok 1 other thing my friend did was just use cos 60 instead of cos 30. The answer comes out to be 1.133x10^-4, which is in fact correct according to my teacher. BUT why would you use 60 degrees. It's an equilateral triangle but you can't just you the right triangle relationships unless you split the triangle up into halves, in which case you would have 30 degrees each...
 

Attachments

  • TriangleCurrent.GIF
    TriangleCurrent.GIF
    1.2 KB · Views: 597
Physics news on Phys.org
NotaPhysicsMan said:
A equilateral triangle with sides of 0.150 m, X being current into and 0 being out of.

Ok it seems that I just have to use: B=uI/2pieR to get the magnitude of the diagonal.
You are substituting values too early and obcsuring the physics. Work it out algebraically and plug in the values at the end.

\vec B = \frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi R} \hat I \times \hat r

So at P the field B from the left wire is 90 deg to the radius so it makes a 60 deg angle to the vertical. Its vertical component is Bcos(60). The same for the wire from the right. The horizontal components are Bsin(60) (right) and Bsin(60)(left) so they cancel.

B_P = 2Bcos(60) = 2\frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi R}(.5) = \frac{\mu_0I}{2\pi R}

AM
 
Darn, I screwed up the degrees...ok 60 is right. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
43
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
621
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K