Solve Node Voltages Problem Homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter k_squared
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a node voltages problem in circuit analysis using Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL). The participant struggles with the matrix representation of the equations, specifically regarding the absence of a resistance term and the definition of node voltages v1 and v2. A suggestion is made to rewrite the nodal analysis equations from scratch before converting them into matrix form, highlighting a typo in the original solution regarding the resistor notation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
  • Knowledge of nodal analysis techniques
  • Basic skills in matrix operations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the principles of Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
  • Study Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) applications in circuit analysis
  • Learn how to perform nodal analysis from scratch
  • Explore matrix representation of circuit equations
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit analysts, and anyone seeking to improve their understanding of node voltage analysis in electrical circuits.

k_squared
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We are told to analyse the circuit in the diagram (ignore the texts) with the method of node voltages.

0zeHibh.jpg

Here is the answer:

d07kUqj.jpg


Homework Equations


Kirchhoff's Current Law
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law

The Attempt at a Solution


So far, all I have been able to get is the equation described by the top line of the matrix relation. However, there is no 0 by the resistance!

Worse, the bottom equation looks to me like (1-alpha)*v_2. And I have no idea where v_2 is even defined, or how this is a valid KCL equation without the value or R_2 anywhere...

Thank you in advance for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your diagram has labelled the nodes 1 and 2. So it is reasonable to assume that v1 corresponds to node 1's voltage and that v2 corresponds to node 2's voltage.

It could be that when you are trying to recover the individual node voltage expressions that you are not correctly carrying out the matrix times vector operation?

I do see one typo in the text's solution though. The resistor in the matrix's first term should be R1, not R.

Why don't you try writing out the nodal analysis equations from scratch. They can always be be wedged into matrix form afterwards.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
13K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K