Solve Nonhomogenous PDE: Equilibrium Temp Distribution, B Value

  • Thread starter Thread starter physstudent.4
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pde
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the nonhomogeneous partial differential equation (PDE) for equilibrium temperature distribution, represented by the equation du/dt=(d^2 u)/dx^2+1. The user initially attempted separation of variables with the assumption u(x,t)=phi(x)*g(t), leading to the conclusion that g(t) is constant. The derived equations ultimately yield a relationship between the boundary condition du/dx (L,t)=B and the parameter lm, specifically B=-lm^2*L+1. The professor clarified that both the equilibrium solution and the specific value of lm are required for a complete solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of partial differential equations (PDEs)
  • Familiarity with boundary value problems
  • Knowledge of separation of variables technique
  • Basic calculus, particularly differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of separation of variables in PDEs
  • Learn about boundary value problems and their solutions
  • Explore equilibrium solutions in nonhomogeneous PDEs
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions on PDE solutions
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in applied mathematics, particularly those focusing on solving partial differential equations and thermal analysis in engineering contexts.

physstudent.4
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


du/dt=(d^2 u)/dx^2+1
u(x,0)=f(x)
du/dx (0,t)=1
du/dx (L,t)=B
du/dt=0
Determine an equilibrium temperature distribution. For what value of B is there a solution?

Homework Equations



Not really sure what to put here.

The Attempt at a Solution


I started by trying to separate variables, with u(x,t)=phi(x)*g(t), and got to
g'(t)/g(t)=phi''(x)/phi(x)+1/(phi(x)g(t))=0.
So g(t) is constant based on the above, but then I get a little lost while trying to solve for phi. I tried letting g(t)=lamda (abbreviated lm from now on), and got

phi''(t)+1/lm=0, which yields a quadratic solution of [(-lm*x^2)/2+x/lm+C/lm] after using the condition du/dx (0,t)=1. Then, since this is phi(x),
u(x,t)= -lm^2*x^2/2+ x + lm*C.
Using the other condition du/dx (L,t)=B, and assuming some quick mental algebra was correct,
B=-lm^2*L+1.
First off, is all of the above a correct approach as far as you can tell? And secondly, do I need to find u(x,t) or a specific value of lm?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I am confused by the question. You say "Determine an equilibrium temperature distribution. For what value of B is there a solution?"

It is very easy to determine the general equilibrium solution. Is the second independent of that or is it asking for a value of B for which there is an equilibrium solution?
 
I found the equilibrium solution easily enough after posting that, I realized I could solve for lm. Another student and I clarified with our professor today, he wants both, which I now have. Thanks though!
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K