Solve Nuclear Physics Decay Problem: A&B Half-Life

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving a nuclear physics decay problem involving two radioactive samples, A and B, with half-lives of 23 minutes and 23 days, respectively. The equation for the number of daughter nuclei at time t is given by n(t)=\frac{N_{0}\lambda_{A}}{\lambda_{B}-\lambda_{A}}[e^{-\lambda_{A}t}-e^{-\lambda_{B}t}]. The challenge is to determine how much time elapses between two instances of the sample emitting 1000 gammas/second after an initial 11.5 minutes. The solution involves calculating the total number of daughter nuclei at t=11.5 minutes and using the derived rate of decay equation to find subsequent gamma emissions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of radioactive decay and half-life concepts
  • Familiarity with differential equations in nuclear physics
  • Knowledge of gamma and beta radiation emission mechanisms
  • Proficiency in logarithmic functions and exponential decay calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and application of the decay constant (\lambda) in radioactive decay
  • Learn about the relationship between half-life and decay constant for radioactive isotopes
  • Explore the mathematical modeling of radioactive decay using differential equations
  • Investigate the implications of simultaneous emissions in multi-isotope decay scenarios
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for nuclear physicists, researchers in radioactivity, and students studying nuclear decay processes who seek to understand complex decay interactions and gamma emission calculations.

SUDOnym
Messages
88
Reaction score
1
Problem is:

have a mother and daughter sample, A and B respectively. both are radioactive. The number of daughter nuclei at time t is given by (*):

n(t)=\frac{N_{0}\lambda_{A}}{\lambda_{B}-\lambda_{A}}[e^{-\lambda_{A}t}-e^{-\lambda_{B}t}]

where N_0 is number of mother nuclei at t=0 and n(t) is number of daughter nuclei at time t.

A has \tau_{\frac{1}{2}}=23minutes and B has \tau_{\frac{1}{2}}=23days.

A is beta only emitter. B emits gamma and Beta. If A has been made and purified and 11.5minutes after this, the sample emits 1000 gammas/second and some time later the sample again emits 1000 gammas/second - how much time has elapsed?

My Thoughts:
I don't know how to handle this problem for the following reason: To find the rate of gammas being emitter, simply differentiate the equation I showed above (*) to get:

\frac{dn}{dt}=\frac{N_{0}\lambda_{A}}{\lambda_{B}-\lambda_{A}}[-\lambda_{A}e^{-\lambda_{A}t}+\lambda_{B}e^{-\lambda_{B}t}]

(note can find the lambda_A and lambda_B as we know the half-llife and can also solve (*) for N_0).

The time dependence of the above equation is a negative exponential... so to solve for t, do some rearranging, and take the natural log... but this will be a linear equation... ie. there will only be one value of t for any dn/dt so it is not clear to me how at 11.5mins can have 1000 gammas/second and then again some time later can also have 1000 gammas/second.

What to do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The best approach is to calculate the total number of daughter nuclei at t=11.5mins, which can be done by plugging in the values of N_0, \lambda_A, \lambda_B, and t into equation (*). Then, you can use this initial value to determine how many daughter nuclei will decay in a given amount of time. For example, if you want to know how many gammas/second are emitted after 11.5minutes have elapsed, you can calculate the rate of decay (dn/dt) of the daughter nuclei over a given time interval. To do this, you can use the equation:\frac{dn}{dt}=\frac{N_{0}\lambda_{A}}{\lambda_{B}-\lambda_{A}}[-\lambda_{A}e^{-\lambda_{A}t}+\lambda_{B}e^{-\lambda_{B}t}]where N_0, \lambda_A, and \lambda_B are as before, and t is the amount of time that has elapsed since 11.5mins.This equation can then be used to calculate the rate of gamma emission at any given point in time after 11.5 minutes have elapsed. By plugging in different values of t, you can determine the amount of time that must elapse in order for the sample to emit 1000 gammas/second again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K