Solve Nuclear Physics Homework: How Many Grams of TNT Needed?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a nuclear physics problem comparing the energy released by the fission of U-235 to that released by the detonation of TNT. The original poster attempts to calculate how many grams of TNT would be needed to match the energy released by one gram of U-235, using mass-energy equivalence principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different interpretations of the problem, with some suggesting that a comparison of actual fission reactions and their products might yield a more accurate assessment. Others provide calculations based on different energy values for U-235 fission and question the validity of the original poster's approach.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem with various calculations presented. Some participants express uncertainty about the original poster's method and suggest alternative approaches. The discussion is productive, with participants seeking clarification and additional context regarding the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential confusion arising from the problem's structure, indicating that it may be part of a larger set of questions. There is a call for more complete information to facilitate better assistance.

Mitchtwitchita
Messages
187
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Nuclear energy changes are significantly greater than chemical changes. The detonation of 1.00 g of the explosive trinitrotoluene (TNT) releases 2.760 kJ. How many grams of TNT would be needed to match the energy released by one gram of U-235?


Homework Equations



Delta E = delta m * c^2


The Attempt at a Solution



Mass U = 234.993 u
Mass e- = 92(0.000549 u)
Mass nucleus = 234.993 u - 92(0.000549 u)
=234.942492 u

92 protons: 92(1.007276 u) = 92.669392 u
143 neutrons: 143(1.008665 u) = 144.239095 u
Total = 236.908487 u

Delta m = 236.908487 - 234.942492
=1.965995 u

Energy released:

Delta m = (1.965995 u)(1.6605 x 10^-27 kg/u)
=3.2645347 x 10^-27 kg

Delta E = delta m * c^2

Therefore, (3.2645347 x 10^-27 kg)(2.998 x 10^8 m/s)^2
=2.934 x 10^-10 J

Therefore, the difference in mass between 1 U-235 nucleus and its constituent nucleons is converted into 2.934 x 10^-10 J of energy.

Since 1.00 g of U-235 = 2.56 x 10^21 nuclei,

(2.934 x 10^-10 J)(2.56 x 10^21 nuclei)
=7.51 x 10^11 J
=7.51 x 10^8 kJ

Therefore, 7.51 x 10^8 kJ/2.760 kJ
=2.72 x 10^8

Therefore, 2.72 x 10^8 g of TNT would be needed to match the energy released by one gram of U-235.

I HAVE NO IDEA IF THIS IS RIGHT OR IF I'M ON THE RIGHT TRACK, COULD SOMEBODY PLEASE LET ME KNOW!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure, it depends on how one interprets the question. What would help are the actual rxns being compared. I think a fairer comparison would be to take a fission reaction for Ur and compare the weights of the products vs the parents and use that in computing the harvestable energy. There is no way to completely pluck apart an atom so complex into its constituent parts.
 
Last edited:
From a previous question I attained a number of 2.82 x 10^-11 J of energy released from the fission of a U-235 nucleus.

Since 1.00 g of U-235 = 2.56 x 10^21 nuclei,

(2.82 x 10^-11 J)(2.56 x 10^21 nuclei)
=7.22 x 10^10 J
=7.22 x 10^7 kJ

Therefore, 7.22 x 10^7 kJ/2760 kJ = 2.6 x 10^7

Therefore, 2.6 x 10^7 g of TNT would be needed to match the energy released by one gram of U-235.

Does this seem like the route you were talking about?
 
Exactly.


(PS: I'm not sure if this was the latter part of a multipart question, but please all viewers, we need the entire problem to be of greatest assistance, including the pieces you have solved.)
 
Thanks immensely denverdoc. Usually they have part a) and part b) to the question. However, in this case, they were two entirely different questions. That's what made it so confusing to me as well. Thanks again!
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
27K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
8K