Solve Order of Operations: x= 48÷2(9+3)

  • Thread starter Thread starter frozonecom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Operations
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the expression x = 48 ÷ 2(9 + 3) and understanding the order of operations. Participants are discussing the ambiguity in the expression and the different interpretations that can arise from it.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are considering how to apply the order of operations and questioning the validity of different approaches that yield varying results. There is a focus on whether the division applies only to 2 or to the entire expression 2(12).

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the ambiguity of the expression and referencing previous discussions on the topic. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of parentheses to clarify the intended order of operations.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of confusion due to the expression's ambiguity and references to differing results from calculators. Participants are encouraged to clarify their expressions to avoid misinterpretation.

frozonecom
Messages
63
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


okay. So here is the problem:

x= 48÷2(9+3)


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



217649_1511536247399_1804180958_914640_856132_n.jpg



So, what I am thinking, is how should the order of operation should be followed. There are different answers when tried using a different order of solving. So, could you please help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The method on the right more closely follows the rules for order of operations. It does begin by changing the division to the equivalent multiplication. After that it does the operations in an order consistent with the rules for order of operations.

The method on the left uses some properties of equations to rewrite the equation as an equivalent equation in a number of its steps. It also makes use of the associative law and does some rather fancy division of fractions. (It's fancy if you're asking this basic a question.) All the steps are the result of legal algebraic operations, so you get the correct result for x.
 
The order of operations should be followed, period. I'm confused that you said that you get different answers, but the two attempts you attached give you the same answer.

If you did a search, you would have found this thread, which has the exact same question:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=488334"

I suggest you read this thread.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
eumyang said:
The order of operations should be followed, period. I'm confused that you said that you get different answers, but the two attempts you attached give you the same answer.

If you did a search, you would have found this thread, which has the exact same question:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=488334"

I suggest you read this thread.

Yeah. I have found that thread. But, with so many words and posts, I'm very much confused on which to follow.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
To summarize that very long thread, expressions such as 48÷2(9+3) should be avoided because of their ambiguity; namely, is 48 being divided by just 2, or is it being divided by [2 * 12]?

To make matters worse, two different calculator models from the same company yield two different answers for the same expression.

To avoid this problem use parentheses to indicate clearly what you're dividing by. If you mean
\frac{48}{2 \cdot 12}

write it as 48/(2 * 12)

Here the parenthese make it clear that the multiplication should occur before the division occurs.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K