Solve Sliding Dresser Problem - Find F, Np, Nq

  • Thread starter Thread starter whitetiger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sliding
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a sliding dresser, where participants are tasked with determining the forces acting on the dresser, specifically the applied force F and the normal forces Np and Nq at either end. The problem is set in the context of kinetic friction and equilibrium conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the equilibrium of forces in both vertical and horizontal directions, questioning the completeness of the original equations presented. There is a focus on the application of torque to find the normal forces and the applied force.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on identifying forces and torques, while others have expressed uncertainty about their approach. There is an ongoing exploration of the relationships between the forces and the equations governing them, with no explicit consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of acceleration in the problem, which implies that the sum of forces must equal zero. There is also mention of the need to consider torque about specific points to solve for the unknowns.

whitetiger
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
http://img244.imageshack.us/img244/1565/mfsto2ie5.jpg

Hi all,

Would some one please take a look at this problem for me? I am trying to work out this problem, but I have some trouble...

The coefficient of kinetic friction between the dresses and the floor is μk. The ground exerts upward normal forces of magnitudes Np and Nq at the ends of the dresser.

a) If the dresser is sliding with constant velocity, find the magnitude of the force F.
b) Find the magnitude of the normal force Np
c) the magnitude of the normal force Nq.

I have tried to work our part of the problem, but I am not sure.

summation Fy = nq - w = 0 so Nq = w
summation Fx = F - f = 0 so F =f
F = μkw so F = μk(mg)
not sure if this is correct, the magnitude of F is
F = μk(mg)

Please help,
 

Attachments

  • mfsto2ie5.jpg
    mfsto2ie5.jpg
    6.9 KB · Views: 772
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You left out one of the forces in your y equation. To find the N_p and N_q you need to use torque.
 
OlderDan said:
You left out one of the forces in your y equation. To find the N_p and N_q you need to use torque.

Thank for replying to my question. I am not sure how to go about it. Can you help? I can further found that the torque for point at Q is

summation torque Q = rwsin(theta)
 
whitetiger said:
Thank for replying to my question. I am not sure how to go about it. Can you help? I can further found that the torque for point at Q is

summation torque Q = rwsin(theta)
There is no acceleration in the problem, so the sum of the forces must be zero. There are three vertical forces and three horizontal forces. You combined two of the horizontal forces in your first post, and you can get away with that in this problem, but it would be good to keep them separate.

There is no rotation in the problem, so the sum of the torques about any point is zero. One of the points of contact with the floor would be a good place about which to calculate the torques. Point Q is a good choice.
 
OlderDan said:
There is no acceleration in the problem, so the sum of the forces must be zero. There are three vertical forces and three horizontal forces. You combined two of the horizontal forces in your first post, and you can get away with that in this problem, but it would be good to keep them separate.

There is no rotation in the problem, so the sum of the torques about any point is zero. One of the points of contact with the floor would be a good place about which to calculate the torques. Point Q is a good choice.

I am total stuck,can someone help please...
 
whitetiger said:
I am total stuck,can someone help please...
List the forces you think are acting vertically. List the forces you think are acting horizontally. List the torques you think are acting about point Q, and we'll take it from there.
 
OlderDan said:
List the forces you think are acting vertically. List the forces you think are acting horizontally. List the torques you think are acting about point Q, and we'll take it from there.

sorry for the delay,

here is what I have so far

Fy = mg = Np +Nq
Fx =f= μk(Np +Nq)
Torque is Fh +NpL - mgL/2 = 0
 
whitetiger said:
sorry for the delay,

here is what I have so far

Fy = 0 » mg = Np + Nq
Fx = 0 » F = f = μk(Np + Nq)
Torque is Fh +NpL - mgL/2 = 0
I know what you mean, but technically you have misused the equal sign in your first two equations so I changed your statement a bit. You have all the needed information in this set of equations except that the magnitude of the applied force equals the magnitude of the friction force (you had that in your original post), so I added that to the equation.

You now have three equations for the three unkowns: F, Nq and Np. All you need to do is solve the system of equations. Can you so that? The first two equations will give you F easily. You can then sustitude F into the last equation to solve for Np. Then . . . .
 
OlderDan said:
I know what you mean, but technically you have misused the equal sign in your first two equations so I changed your statement a bit. You have all the needed information in this set of equations except that the magnitude of the applied force equals the magnitude of the friction force (you had that in your original post), so I added that to the equation.

You now have three equations for the three unkowns: F, Nq and Np. All you need to do is solve the system of equations. Can you so that? The first two equations will give you F easily. You can then sustitude F into the last equation to solve for Np. Then . . . .
This is what I have for the problem:
Fy = 0 » mg = Np + Nq =======> mg = Np + Nq
Fx = 0 » F = f = μk(Np + Nq) =====> F = f = μk(Np + Nq) , since mg = Np + Nq, we can replace Fx equation with mg. This will give us F=f=μk(mg)

Replacing the F equation back into the torque equation Fh +NpL - mgL/2 = 0 and we get Np = (mg(L/2)-μk(mg)h)/L

After getting Np value, we substitute that back into mg = Np + Nq and solve for Nq

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thank you very much for your help. I am now able to calculate for all the required variables.

Have a good day,
WT
 
Last edited:
  • #10
whitetiger said:
This is what I have for the problem:
Fy = 0 » mg = Np + Nq =======> mg = Np + Nq
Fx = 0 » F = f = μk(Np + Nq) =====> F = f = μk(Np + Nq) , since mg = Np + Nq, we can replace Fx equation with mg. This will give us F=f=μk(mg)

Replacing the F equation back into the torque equation Fh +NpL - mgL/2 = 0 and we get Np = (mg(L/2)-μk(mg)h)/L

After getting Np value, we substitute that back into mg = Np + Nq and solve for Nq

Please correct me if I am wrong.

Thank you very much for your help. I am now able to calculate for all the required variables.

Have a good day,
WT
Looks good. I think you got it.:smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
12K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K