MHB Solve sqrt (x+ a) = x −7 when a=-1

  • Thread starter Thread starter rebo1984
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The equation sqrt(x - 1) = x - 7 is analyzed with a = -1. Substituting potential solutions, x = 5 yields an incorrect result, as 2 does not equal -2. Similarly, testing x = 10 also fails to satisfy the equation. The discussion concludes that there is no valid solution for the equation when a = -1. Therefore, the solution set is determined to be no solution.
rebo1984
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
Hi,

If a = -1, what is the solution set of the equation sqrt (x+ a) = x −7

{5}
{10}
{5, 10}
No solution(5,10) correct?

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
rebo1984 said:
Hi,

If a = -1, what is the solution set of the equation sqrt (x+ a) = x −7

{5}
{10}
{5, 10}
No solution(5,10) correct?

Thanks

What do you get when you substitute each potential solution into the original equation?
 
MarkFL said:
What do you get when you substitute each potential solution into the original equation?

It works out.
 
rebo1984 said:
It works out.

Let's try \(x=5\):

$$\sqrt{5-1}=5-7$$

$$2=-2$$

Is this true?
 
rebo1984 said:
It works out.
What "works out"? Which answer did you get?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
982
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
965
Replies
41
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top