Solve the Riddle: 4*12=6, 8*8=1, 5*6?

  • Thread starter Thread starter roeller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Riddle
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The riddle presented involves multiplication under modular arithmetic, specifically modulo 7 and modulo 21. The calculations reveal that 4*12=6 mod 7 and 8*8=1 mod 7, leading to the conclusion that 5*6=2 mod 7. However, further analysis shows that both equations also hold true under modulo 3, resulting in 5*6=0 mod 3. Ultimately, the most comprehensive answer is 5*6=9 mod 21, as it satisfies both initial conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with equivalence classes of integers
  • Basic multiplication and factorization skills
  • Knowledge of common factors and their significance in modular equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of modular arithmetic in depth
  • Learn about equivalence classes and their applications
  • Explore the concept of common factors in number theory
  • Investigate advanced modular equations and their solutions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students in number theory, and anyone interested in solving modular arithmetic problems.

roeller
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi there

I have a riddle here, i cannot solve. :cry:
Please help me. :shy:

If
4*12=6
and
8*8=1

what's 5*6?

Thank you in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
2

(It's multiplication mod 7.)
 
Thanks! That's it!
 
Curiosity, what is the reasoning exactly?
 
devious gave his reasoning: it's multiplication modulo 7:

4*12= 48= 7*6+ 6 so 4*12= 6 mod 7
8* 8= 64= 7*9+ 1 so 8*8= 1 mod 7

then 5*6= 30= 4*7+ 2 so 5*6= 2 mod 7.

HOWEVER, that is not the only answer. If fact, that 12 in "4*12" as well as the 8 in "8*8" makes me suspicious of the multiplication being "mod 7". It is common (but not required) to reduce numbers to be less that the modulo number. (Strictly speaking the objects in "modulo arithmetic" are equivalence classes of integers. You can use any number in an equivalence class to "represent" it and it is common to use the smallest positive number.)

Saying 4*12= 6 (mod k) means 4*12= 48= nk+ 6 for some integer n. That is the same as nk= 42.
Saying 8*8= 1 (mod k) means 8*8= 64= mk+ 1 for some integer m. That is the same as mk= 63.
42 factors as 2*3*7 and 63 factors as 3*3*7.

It is the fact that 7 is a common factor (so 42= n(7) with n=6) that leads to the conclusion that 4*12= 6 (mod 7) and (63= m(7) with m= 9) 8*8= 1 (mod 7).

Of course, 3 is also a common factor: 42= n(3) with n= 14 and 63= m(3) with m= 21. 4*12= 48= 42+ 6= (14)(3)= 6 so 4*12= 6 (mod 3) and 8*8= 64= 63+ 1= (21)(3)+ 1 so 8*8= 1 (mod 3). Of course that "= 6 (mod 3)" looks a little strange since, as I said, we normally choose a representative less than the base. Of course, 5*6= 30= 3*10 so 5*6= 0 (mod 3).

My preference would be (mod 3*7) or (mod 21).
Since 4*12= 48= 42+ 6= 2(21)+ 6, 4*12= 6 (mod 21).
Since 8*8= 64= 63+ 1= 3(21)+ 1, 8*8= 1 (mod 21).

That gives 5*6= 30= 21+ 9 so 5*6= 9 (mod 21).

I would support 9 as the best answer.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K