Solve X-Forces for Frame Statics Problem

  • Context: Engineering 
  • Thread starter Thread starter bob1352
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Frame Statics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving X-forces in a frame statics problem, specifically using the method of sections. The participant has calculated Y forces as Dy = 171.43 N, Cy = 228.57 N, and By = -428.57 N, while attempting to determine X forces. The participant initially concluded that Bx, Cx, and Dx should be zero, but feedback indicated that the value of Dx was incorrect due to the nature of member DE acting as a beam supported at both ends. The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding the constraints at pivots and the forces acting on multi-force members.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of frame statics principles
  • Familiarity with the method of sections for analyzing structures
  • Knowledge of free body diagrams (FBD) and their application
  • Concept of multi-force members and their behavior under loads
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the method of sections in structural analysis
  • Study the behavior of beams under various support conditions
  • Learn how to accurately construct and interpret free body diagrams
  • Explore the implications of constraints on force calculations in frame structures
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, civil engineering students, and professionals involved in analyzing frame structures and statics problems.

bob1352
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
This is a weekly assignment problem.
Relevant Equations
Fnetx = 0
Fnety = 0
Sum of Moments at a point = 0
So for this problem I have already solved for the Y forces: Dy = 171.43 N, Cy = 228.57 N, and By = -428.57 N. For the X forces I split up the frame and took the moment of DE.

Me = 1.5(300) + 3.5(300) - 5(Dx), Dx = 300

For CD Dx = -Cx fo I got Cx = 300, as when you forces are two member Dx = -300 on member CD. Then I used the moment of ABC to solve for Bx

Ma = -2.5(Bx) + (5)300, Bx = 600 N.

I am almost positive my Y forces are correct, but I am unsure of the X-forces and I can balance the moments, but not the sum of the forces. Am I correct or am I missing something?
AEC-270 4-3.PNG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Note that support A is of a type that is unable to take horizontal loads.
Link BD is working under compression, while link BE is working under tension.
Therefore, there are two x-component forces acting on B in opposite directions.
 
So Bx, Cx and Dx should be zero then? I am not using the method of joints, but the technique for multi-force members.
 
bob1352 said:
So Bx, Cx and Dx should be zero then?
What makes you to think that way?
bob1352 said:
I am not using the method of joints, but the technique for multi-force members.
Could you show us the FBD that you have done so far?
 
Lnewqban said:
What makes you to think that way?

Could you show us the FBD that you have done so far?
Sure, here you go. I split the frame into parts as what the method of sections suggests.
 

Attachments

bob1352 said:
Sure, here you go. I split the frame into parts as what the method of sections suggests.
Apologies about the delayed response.
Your work looks good, but your value of Dx is incorrect.
Member DE acts as a beam supported at both ends, not like a cantilever beam.
That is because pivot E can't provide any reactive moment.

Simultaneously, pin D is not free to rotate around pivot E under the two lateral loads.
A force must be preventing that rotation from happening.
That force reaches pin D via ground-member AB-pin B-member BD.

Frame Statics Problem (1).jpg
 

Attachments

Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K