Solving 2 Body Problems with Tension: Lack of Teacher Guidance

  • Thread starter Thread starter rwofford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Teacher
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving two bodies with tension, specifically a large cube being accelerated across a frictionless surface with a smaller cube on top. The challenge is to determine the minimum force required to prevent the smaller cube from sliding off due to gravity and the applied force.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces acting on the small cube, including gravitational and frictional forces, and question the relationship between the acceleration of both cubes. There are inquiries about the necessary calculations and the role of the coefficient of friction.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided hints and guidance on how to approach the problem, including the importance of free body diagrams and the relationship between forces. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup and calculations are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the problem due to a lack of prior instruction on similar topics, and there are mentions of the need for additional resources or guidance.

rwofford
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
My teacher gave me this problem but we haven't even gone over two body probles with tension...especially those where one object is going another direction...
1) The drawing shows a large cube (mass = 21 kg) being accelerated across a horizontal frictionless surface by a horizontal force P. A small cube (mass = 2.1 kg) is in contact with the front surface of the large cube and will slide downward unless P is sufficiently large. The coefficient of static friction between the cubes is 0.71. What is the smallest magnitude that P can have in order to keep the small cube from sliding downward?

I don't know where to begin...are there any sites that would be helpful to someone who has not been taught how to do these types of problems...?
 

Attachments

  • 04_47.gif
    04_47.gif
    6 KB · Views: 539
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the magnitude of the force downward on the small front cube? What is the magnitude of the retarding frictional force upward due to the acceleration P?
 
isnt the acceleration of the large and small cube the same..? but they don't tell me the acceleration...
 
rwofford said:
isnt the acceleration of the large and small cube the same..? but they don't tell me the acceleration...
You're supposed to calculate the acceleration P where the front cube (yes, accelerating at P also) has its gravitational force down and its frictional force up balancing. Write the two equations for those two forces, and set them equal and see if that solves P for you. Let's see the work.
 
Gotta go. Good luck!
 
One has to calculate the horizontal force P which produces an acceleration.

P acts on the large and small cubes. The objective is determine the acceleration for which friction between small and large cube will prevent the small cube from falling.

So gravity pulls down the small cube, and the friction force operates vertically (in opposition to gravity). The friction force is simply the static coefficient * normal force which is simply the mass * acceleration.

The force P accelerates the large block against the small block, which also must be accelerating at the same rate for both to move together. But remember, mass resists acceleration or change in momentum.
 
Last edited:
Fg=mg
=21(9.8)
=205.8 N

=(2.1)(9.8)
=20.58

so i know: Ns * Fn = ma
0.71*Fn=205.8N(a)
 
i might as well give up...i am horrible at physics
 
Hint 1: What is the only force supporting the weight of the small cube? (Astronuc gave you this one.)

Hint 2: Use that fact to calculate the required normal force between the two cubes.

Hint 3: Use that fact to determine the resulting acceleration of the small cube.

That's enough hints for now! Solve it algebraically (using symbols) as much as possible--don't be in a rush to plug in numbers.
 
  • #10
the normal force=mg
so : 2.1(9.8)=20.58 N
so : 0.71(20.58)=ma
so : 14.6118=ma
 
  • #11
rwofford said:
the normal force=mg
No, the friction force equals the weight.
 
  • #12
do i plug in 2.1 or 21 for m?
 
  • #13
Any effort is wasted unless you begin by drawing the free body diagrams for all the objects in the problem.
 
  • #14
We are talking about the smaller cube, so use its mass.

Gokul speaks truth--do as he advises.
 
  • #15
so : 14.6118 = 2.1a
so : 6.958 = a
 
  • #16
i think ill give up now...i am dumb..............................
 
  • #17
is this right/?
 
  • #18
No, it is not.

You need to start at the beginning. Follow these steps EXACTLY:

1. Draw and label the forces acting on the little block.

2. Write down the net force (sum of all forces) acting in the vertical direction, and the net force acting in the horizontal direction. Use symbols to represent various quantities. Save the actual numbers for the very end.

3. Write down Newton's Second Law for each of these two directions, and plug in the expressions for the net force and acceleration in each direction.

Do these steps here, and we'll see how it goes...
 
  • #19
How does one use the 'coefficient of friction', [itex]\mu[/itex]? What is the relationship between friction and normal force?

This part is correct - the weight (or gravitational force) of the small block.
=(2.1)(9.8)
=20.58 N (One should write units)

Now one must determine the vertical friction force, which is proportional to the normal (horizontal) force, which is proportional to the acceleration of the small block.

That acceleration comes from the force P acting on both blocks.

I recommend doing as Gokul suggested with the force diagrams, and please refer to the steps mentioned by Doc Al.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
15
Views
10K
Replies
10
Views
3K