Solving 2nd order PDE of single variable

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the second-order partial differential equation (PDE) given by \(\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial r^2} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\left(\beta + \frac{1}{r}\right)+\frac{\beta}{r}u=0\). The known solution is \(u(r) = \beta \cdot \exp(-\beta r)\). The Frobenius Method is employed to derive the solution, leading to the indicial equation \(\sigma^2 - \sigma + \sigma = 0\) with a root of \(\sigma = 0\) of multiplicity 2. This method confirms that the derived solution aligns with the known solution involving the series for \(\beta e^{-\beta r}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order partial differential equations
  • Familiarity with the Frobenius Method for solving differential equations
  • Knowledge of series solutions and recursion relationships
  • Basic concepts of singular points in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Frobenius Method in detail for various types of differential equations
  • Explore the derivation of series solutions for second-order PDEs
  • Learn about singular points and their implications in differential equations
  • Investigate other methods for solving second-order PDEs, such as the method of characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with differential equations, particularly those focusing on theoretical and applied mathematics involving PDEs.

nigels
Messages
36
Reaction score
0
I've been getting pretty rusty in terms of derivation in recent years. Encountered this problem which I can't derive the steps despite knowing the solution.

\frac{\partial^2 u}{\partial r^2} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial r}\left(\beta + \frac{1}{r}\right)+\frac{\beta}{r}u=0

Known solution:

u(r) = \beta \cdot \exp(-\beta r)

Thank you very much for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the differential equation has the form of:
(\frac{∂}{∂r})2 u(r) + a(r) \frac{∂}{∂r} u(r) + b(r) u(r) =0​
With a(r) having a simple pole at r=0, and b(r) having no more than a pole of order 2 at r=0, it is sufficient to continue with the Frobenius Method:
u(r) = rσ \sum knrn
You can then substitute this into the equation to get something like:
\sum kn ((n+σ)(n+σ-1)+(n+σ)+(n+σ+1)βr) rn+σ-1 = 0​
This means that the indicial equation becomes:
σ2-σ+σ=0
σ=0, multiplicity 2.​
Using σ=0 the next step is to determine the recursion relationship which will give you kn. This get's one independent solution that you can show is the same as the series for βe-βr.
And then you're done.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K