Solving a 3x3 Matrix with Lambda: A Tutorial

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
rugbygirl2
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I am having trouble figuring out lambda for the 3x3, I have only done 2x2.
My matrix:
4 1 4
1 7 1
4 1 4




The Attempt at a Solution


I know that when I add lambda (L) in it looks like
4-L 1 4
1 7-L 1
4 1 4-L

When I do a 2x2, I would just cross multiply as my next step then solve for L values, but I don't know how to do that here. Any help would be appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can expand a determinant along any row or column. For example, expanding along the top row gives:

[tex]\begin{vmatrix} 4-\lambda & 1 & 4 \\ 1 & 7-\lambda & 1 \\ 4 & 1 & 4-\lambda \end{vmatrix} = (4-\lambda) \begin{vmatrix}7-\lambda& 1 \\ 1& 4-\lambda\end{vmatrix}-(1)\begin{vmatrix}1& 1 \\ 4& 4-\lambda \end{vmatrix}+(4)\begin{vmatrix} 1& 7-\lambda \\ 4 & 1 \end{vmatrix}[/tex]

And each of the 2x2 determinants can be found by "cross-multiplication" as usual.
 
Last edited:
rugbygirl2 said:

Homework Statement



I am having trouble figuring out lambda for the 3x3, I have only done 2x2.
My matrix:
4 1 4
1 7 1
4 1 4

The Attempt at a Solution


I know that when I add lambda (L) in it looks like
4-L 1 4
1 7-L 1
4 1 4-L

When I do a 2x2, I would just cross multiply as my next step then solve for L values, but I don't know how to do that here. Any help would be appreciated!

You can tell immediately just by looking at the matrix that 0 is one of the eigenvalues, with

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{c}<br /> 1 \\<br /> 0 \\<br /> -1 \end{array}\right][/tex]

a corresponding eigenvector. Can you see why?