Finding a Nonzero 3x3 Matrix A Such That Ax is Perpendicular to [1,2,3]

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding a nonzero 3x3 matrix A such that the product Ax is perpendicular to the vector [1, 2, 3] for all x in R3. Participants explore the implications of this condition and the nature of perpendicular vectors in a linear algebra context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of perpendicularity and consider specific vectors that are perpendicular to [1, 2, 3]. There are inquiries about the general approach to constructing such a matrix A. Some suggest that all columns of A must be perpendicular to [1, 2, 3]. Others raise concerns about the existence of a nonzero determinant for A and propose the possibility of having zero columns.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have provided insights into the nature of the vector space formed by vectors perpendicular to [1, 2, 3], while others question the feasibility of finding a suitable matrix A. There is no explicit consensus yet, but several productive lines of reasoning have been established.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the set of vectors perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] forms a plane through the origin, indicating a vector subspace. This geometric interpretation may influence the approaches discussed.

skyflashings
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Find a nonzero 3x3 matrix A such that Ax is perpendicular to [1,2,3] for all x in R3

A vector perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] could be, say, [-2, 1, 0]. But what would be a general approach to finding a solution that would satisfy all x? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
what definition of perpendicular are you using?
 
skyflashings said:
Find a nonzero 3x3 matrix A such that Ax is perpendicular to [1,2,3] for all x in R3

A vector perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] could be, say, [-2, 1, 0]. But what would be a general approach to finding a solution that would satisfy all x? Thanks!
[-2, 1, 0] is perpendicular to [1, 2, 3]. However there are many others which are perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] and are also linearly independent of [-2, 1, 0] .

I suppose you need to take the scalar product of Ax and [-2, 1, 0] and set it to zero.
 
SammyS said:
[-2, 1, 0] is perpendicular to [1, 2, 3]. However there are many others which are perpendicular to [1, 2, 3] and are also linearly independent of [-2, 1, 0] .

I suppose you need to take the scalar product of Ax and [-2, 1, 0] and set it to zero.

If [itex]\vec{x} = (x_1, x_2, \ldots, x_n)^T[/itex] and A has columns [itex]\vec{v}_1, \ldots, \vec{v}_n,[/itex] then
[tex]A \vec{x} = x_1 \vec{v}_1 + x_2 \vec{v}_2 + \cdots + x_n \vec{v}_n.[/tex] Since you want this to be perpendicular to [1,2,3] for all x, all the vectors [itex]\vec{v}_i[/itex] must be perpendicular to [1,2,3].

PS: Does anyone know how to get the "\boldmath" command to work in the version of tex used here?

RGV
 
i don't think such an A can be found whose determinant is non-zero.

therefore, one may choose some of the columns of A to be 0 columns, which makes the problem rather simple.
 
Ray Vickson said:
PS: Does anyone know how to get the "\boldmath" command to work in the version of tex used here?

[tex]\textbf{A}[/tex]
does \textbf{} help?
 
the set of vectors perpindicular to (1,2,3)^T will form a plane through the origin, in fact they form a vector subspace

If you could find an operator that maps any vector onto that plane, then you would have a suitable operator...
 
lanedance said:
[tex]\textbf{A}[/tex]
does \textbf{} help?

Let's try it: [itex]\textbf{A}.[/itex] So, yes, it works. Thank you.

RGV
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
970
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K