Solving a Grad f Statement: Finding, Evaluating, and Integrating

  • Thread starter Thread starter joemama69
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Grad Integrating
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the gradient of a function and performing line integrals in the context of vector calculus. The specific problem involves finding a scalar function from its gradient and evaluating integrals along specified paths, including a curve defined by an ellipse.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss finding the scalar function f from the given gradient and explore the evaluation of line integrals along different paths. There are attempts to clarify the parameterization of the curve and the correct application of vector calculus principles.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights and corrections regarding the parameterization of the curve and the evaluation of integrals. There is ongoing exploration of the correct methods and interpretations, with some participants questioning the assumptions made in earlier posts.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating potential typos and misunderstandings in the problem statement, particularly regarding the limits of integration and the correct parameterization of the curve defined by the ellipse equation. There is also a focus on ensuring that the mathematical expressions align with the requirements of the problem.

joemama69
Messages
390
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



grad f = (3x2 + y2)i + (2xy - 3)j

a) find f

b) evalue the integral of grad f dot dr where c is any path from 1,2 to 2,1

c)evaluate the integral of gradf dot dr where c is the curve given by 4x2 + 9y2 = 36

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a) f = x3 + xy2 - 3j

b) integral grad f dot dr = f(Q) - f(P) = (1 + 4 - 12) - (8 + 2 - 3) = -14

c) integral grad f dot dr = integral F(r(t)) dot r'(t) is this the correct method

r(t) = 4cost i + 9sint j
r'(t) = -4sint i + 9cost j

F(r(t)) = (3(4cost)2 + (9sint)2)i + (2(4cost)(9sint) - 3)j

F(r(t)) dot r'(t) = (3(-4sint)(4cost)2 + (-4sint)(9sint)2) + (2(9cost)(4cost)(9sint) - 3(9cost)

= (3(-4sint)(4cost)2 + (-4sint)(9sint)2) + (2(9cost)(4cost)(9sint) - 3(9cost)

=[tex]\int[/tex] -192(cost)2sint + 324(sint)3 + 648(cost)2(sint)2 - 27cost dt from 0 to pi

is this correct thus far
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joemama69 said:
a) f = x3 + xy2 - 3j

Be more mindful of typos; I'm sure you meant to write " f = x3 + xy2 - 3y", right?

b) integral grad f dot dr = f(Q) - f(P) = (1 + 4 - 12) - (8 + 2 - 3) = -14

I see two problems here:

(1) [itex]3*2\neq 12[/itex]

(2) You seem to be going from P=(2,1) to Q=(1,2), but the problem statement you posted suggests that the curve goes from P=(1,2) to Q=(2,1)

c) integral grad f dot dr = integral F(r(t)) dot r'(t) is this the correct method

Careful, [itex]\vec{r}'(t)=\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}\neq d\vec{r}[/itex]. Intstead you should have written [itex]d\vec{r}=\vec{r}'(t)dt[/itex]

r(t) = 4cost i + 9sint j

This parameterization does not describe the correct curve. Using your parameterization, x(t)=4cos(t) and y(t)=9sin(t)...That would mean that [itex]4x^2+9y^2=64\cos^2 t+ 729\sin^2 t=64+665 sin^2 t\neq 36[/itex]
 
b) f(Q) - f(P) = (8+2-3) - (1+4-6) = 5

c) don't i have to keep them as vectors

r(t) = 64cos2t i + 729sin2t j

r'(t) = -64sin2t i - 729sin2t j
 
joemama69 said:
b) f(Q) - f(P) = (8+2-3) - (1+4-6) = 5

[itex](8+2-3)-(1+4-6)=(7)-(-1)=8\neq 5[/itex]

c) don't i have to keep them as vectors

r(t) = 64cos2t i + 729sin2t j

r'(t) = -64sin2t i - 729sin2t j

I'm not exactly sure what you are trying to ask here, but you do understand that any 2D curve can be parameterized as [itex]\vec{r}(t)=x(t)\hat{i}+y(t)\hat{j}[/itex] right?

So when you write [itex]\vec{r}(t)=4\cos(t)\hat{i}+9\sin(t)\hat{j}[/itex], you are essentially saying that at every point along your curve, [itex]x(t)=4\cos(t)[/itex] and [itex]y(t)=9\sin(t)[/itex]. This isn't true though, because you are told that [itex]4x^2+9y^2=36[/itex] at every point on your curve; and [itex]x(t)=4\cos(t)[/itex] and [itex]y(t)=9\sin(t)[/itex] don't satisfy that equation.

You need to choose an [itex]x(t)[/itex] and [itex]y(t)[/itex] that do satisfy the equation [itex]4x(t)^2+9y(t)^2=36[/itex] for all values of t.
 
r(t) = 3cost i + 2sint j
r'(t) = -3sint i + 2cost j

f = x3 + xy2 - 3y

f(r(t)) = (3cost)3 + (3cost)(2sint)2 - 3(2sint)

I then have to dot it with r'(t), but my f(r(t)) is not in vector form, there are no i,j,z compnents, how do i proceed
 
joemama69 said:
r(t) = 3cost i + 2sint j
r'(t) = -3sint i + 2cost j

f = x3 + xy2 - 3y

f(r(t)) = (3cost)3 + (3cost)(2sint)2 - 3(2sint)

I then have to dot it with r'(t), but my f(r(t)) is not in vector form, there are no i,j,z compnents, how do i proceed

I thought the question wanted you to compute Grad(f) dot dr...
 
you right

[tex]\int[/tex] (27cos2 + 4sin2)i + (12sincos - 3)j dot (-3sin i + 2cos j) dt =

[tex]\int[/tex] -81cos2sin - 12sin3 + 24sincos2 - 6cos dt

how do i integrate that
 
  • #10
joemama69 said:
you right

[tex]\int[/tex] (27cos2 + 4sin2)i + (12sincos - 3)j dot (-3sin i + 2cos j) dt =

[tex]\int[/tex] -81cos2sin - 12sin3 + 24sincos2 - 6cos dt

how do i integrate that

The easiest way is to write [itex]\sin^3(t)=\sin(t)(1-\cos^2(t))=\sin(t)-\sin(t)\cos^2(t)[/itex], then separate everything into three integrals of the form

[tex]c_1\int \sin(t)\cos^2(t)dt+c_2\int \sin(t)dt+c_3\int\cos(t)dt[/tex]

Which I'm sure you know how to integrate.

By the way, are you supposed to calculate this over the entire ellipse, or just some section of it?
 
  • #11
evaluate grad f dot dr, where c is the curve given by 4x^2 + 9y^2 = 36
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
13K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K