Solving a Linear System with Dimensional Analysis

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the linear system represented by the matrix equation Ax = b, where A is a 3x3 matrix involving trigonometric functions of L and λ, and b is the zero vector. The user initially struggled with the solution, particularly with the parameter λ, which is derived from the physical context of the problem as λ = √(P/(E I)). After correcting an algebraic error in the matrix, the user determined that λ must be solved first to ensure the matrix is singular, yielding λ = 4.0575/L. The discussion highlights the importance of dimensional analysis in verifying the correctness of the matrix formulation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of linear algebra concepts, specifically matrix equations.
  • Familiarity with dimensional analysis in physics and engineering contexts.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their application in matrix formulations.
  • Experience with Mathematica or similar computational tools for solving linear systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the process of determining matrix singularity and its implications in linear algebra.
  • Learn about dimensional analysis and its role in verifying physical equations.
  • Explore the use of Mathematica for solving complex linear systems and matrix equations.
  • Investigate the characteristic equation of matrices and its applications in engineering problems.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in engineering, particularly those dealing with linear algebra and dimensional analysis in physical systems, as well as anyone looking to improve their problem-solving skills in computational mathematics.

TheFerruccio
Messages
216
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Solve the Ax=b

Homework Equations


A=##\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & \cos (L \lambda ) & \sin (L \lambda ) \\
\sin \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) & -\cos \left(\frac{L
\lambda }{2}\right) & -\sin \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)
\\
\lambda \cos \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)+4 \sin
\left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) & \lambda \sin \left(\frac{L
\lambda }{2}\right) & -\lambda \cos \left(\frac{L \lambda
}{2}\right) \\
\end{array}
\right)##
b=zero vector.
x = what I am trying to solve for.

The Attempt at a Solution



This can be done a variety of ways, including in Mathematica. Do I try to solve for λ first, then plug it into the matrix, and solve for x? I've found that even being very precise with my λ yields x = 0. Is there any other way to approach this problem that is simpler?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the context for this problem? I ask because if it's from a physical situation where L represents a length, then it looks, based on dimensional analysis, like you may have made a mistake in deriving the matrix.

When you say you solved for ##\lambda##, what criterion were you using — that A is singular?
 
Whoa, you're right! I usually check that. I totally forgot. λ in this case is √(P/(E I)) which has dimensions of 1/length. So, I corrected the matrix (algebra error that I subsequently found):

##\left(
\begin{array}{ccc}
0 & \cos (L \lambda ) & \sin (L \lambda ) \\
\sin \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) & -\cos \left(\frac{L
\lambda }{2}\right) & -\sin \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)
\\
\lambda \cos \left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)+\frac{4 \sin
\left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right)}{L} & \lambda \sin
\left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) & -\lambda \cos
\left(\frac{L \lambda }{2}\right) \\
\end{array}
\right)##

Also, yes, I'm solving it with the assumption that I want the matrix to be singular, so I have to solve for λ first, by taking the determinant and solving the characteristic equation.

This yields the first λ = 4.0575/L. Converting from the def. of λ, I get ##P=\frac{(4.0575^2) \text{E} \text{I}}{L^2}##.
This problem is an excerpt from a larger problem I have been working on in the engineering section, but I felt that this part would get some visibility here. Thanks for pointing out the dimensional error.

Now, the only thing that remains baffling me is the lack of a "k" anywhere in my matrix. The problem is from here: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=727016. I will post my dilemma in that thread.

A side note: I really hope I am following the forum policy correctly. Engineering problems are tough to pose in this environment, as they bring in a lot of different mathematics concepts into one. I felt compelled to lift the linear algebra problem out of there and into somewhere with more visibility. This problem, as far as the linear algebra of it is concerned, is solved now. Thanks again! Apologies if I accidentally violated policy by not properly encapsulating my problems into single threads.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K