Solving a Physics Problem Using Archimedes Principle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around applying Archimedes' principle to a physics problem involving a hemispherical cap submerged in fluid. Participants explore the forces acting on the cap and question the applicability of Archimedes' principle in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss integrating fluid pressure to find forces acting on the cap and consider using Archimedes' principle for a potentially simpler solution. Some question whether the force exerted by the fluid on the cap can be equated to the weight of the displaced fluid.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing various perspectives on the forces involved. Some suggest that Archimedes' principle may not apply due to the cap being partially submerged and resting on a surface, while others propose modifications to account for the specific setup of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing clarifications regarding the role of atmospheric pressure and the conditions under which Archimedes' principle is applicable. Participants express uncertainty about the assumptions made regarding the fluid's effect on the cap and the implications of the cap's position in relation to the fluid and the atmosphere.

  • #31
If the container is surrounded by the atmosphere, then there would be three forces acting on the cap. The cap covers the hole which is open to the atmosphere. So, the atmosphere is in contact with the inner surface of the hemispherical cap. (As I interpret the diagram in the problem, the hemispherical cap does not contain a flat bottom. It is just a thin hemispherical shell.)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanya Sharma
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
TSny said:
If the container is surrounded by the atmosphere, then there would be three forces acting on the cap. The cap covers the hole which is open to the atmosphere. So, the atmosphere is in contact with the inner surface of the hemispherical cap. (As I interpret the diagram in the problem, the hemispherical cap does not contain a flat bottom. It is just a thin hemispherical shell.)

Ok .

Considering upward positive and normal reaction force due to floor be N ,the sum of the three forces should be zero .

Force due to liquid on curved surface + Force due to atmospheric pressure on the inner surface of shell + Normal reaction = 0 .

##(ρgπ\frac{2}{3}R^3−ρgπR^2H-P_0πR^2) + (P_0πR^2)+ N= 0 ##

Hence , ##N = ρgπR^2H-ρgπ\frac{2}{3}R^3## .
 
  • #33
Tanya Sharma said:
Ok .

Considering upward positive and normal reaction force due to floor be N ,the sum of the three forces should be zero .

Force due to liquid on curved surface + Force due to atmospheric pressure on the inner surface of shell + Normal reaction = 0 .

##(ρgπ\frac{2}{3}R^3−ρgπR^2H-P_0πR^2) + (P_0πR^2)+ N= 0 ##

Hence , ##N = ρgπR^2H-ρgπ\frac{2}{3}R^3## .

Yes, I believe that's it.

I think Chet was pointing out earlier that the extra atmospheric force term on the curved surface is canceled by the atmospheric force acting on the underside of the hemisphere. You see that in the calculation above.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanya Sharma
  • #34
Thank you very much.

Yes, Chet was right . I was misinterpreting the setup.

Please have a look at the attached image . Kindly help me in understanding why is force due to liquid on right side on the ball = ##pπR^2## and that due to fluid on left side is ##3pπR^2## .
 

Attachments

  • ball.PNG
    ball.PNG
    15.7 KB · Views: 460
Last edited:
  • #35
Think of a truncated sphere immersed in a region of uniform pressure Po. Assume that the only force acting on the truncated sphere is due to this surrounding pressure. If it makes sense to you that the sphere will not be pushed in any direction by the fluid pressure, then you conclude that the net force due to the pressure must be zero. So, you can compare the force on the curved surface with the force on the flat portion,
 

Attachments

  • Truncated Sphere.png
    Truncated Sphere.png
    1.8 KB · Views: 435
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanya Sharma
  • #36
Should I think of the portion of ball on the left in isolation ? I mean should I consider the forces acting on the ball(truncated sphere) on the left side?

If yes , then

Force due to fluid on left+Force due to wall +Force exerted by the portion of ball towards right on the left portion = 0 .
 
Last edited:
  • #37
Let's say you want the force that the fluid on the left side of the wall exerts on the ball in your picture in #34. This is the same as the force that the fluid in my picture exerts on the curved portion of the truncated sphere if Po = 3p. But in my picture you can relate this force to the force that the fluid exerts on the flat portion of the truncated sphere.
 
  • #38
When I first came across this problem , I got the answer right . But on second thoughts my reasoning seemed too muddled up.

I have understood your post#35 . In your picture the force due to fluid on left would be equal and opposite to that of force exerted on the flat surface = ##3pπR^2## .

But I am sorry I am not able to relate your picture with the setup I posted in post#34 .

TSny said:
But in my picture you can relate this force to the force that the fluid exerts on the flat portion of the truncated sphere.

Which fluid is exerting force on the flat surface of truncated sphere (on the left), the one with pressure P or 3P ? There is also the wall exerting force on the flat surface . In addition, there would be force from the remaining part of the sphere (the one on the right) .
 
Last edited:
  • #39
In post #35, the purpose was to see that the fluid exerts a force on the curved surface of ##3p\pi R^2## by comparing with the force on the flat portion. Now you can forget the flat portion and conclude that whenever the curved portion is exposed to a fluid of uniform pressure ##3p##, the force on the curved portion will be ##3p\pi R^2##. In your problem, the curved portion of the sphere on the left of the wall is exposed to a pressure of ##3p##. So, the force on that portion will be ##3p\pi R^2##. I think that's a valid argument unless I am overlooking something.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Tanya Sharma
  • #40
Thank you very much :oldsmile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
731
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
12K