Solving a Physics Shell Explosion Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter clucky
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explosion
AI Thread Summary
The physics problem involves a shell shot at 20 m/s at a 60-degree angle, which explodes into two equal fragments at the top of its trajectory. One fragment falls vertically with zero horizontal velocity, while the other continues moving horizontally. The conservation of momentum in the x-direction is key to solving the problem, as the horizontal component of the velocity must be calculated for the moving fragment. The trajectory of the shell before the explosion can be used to determine the position at the time of the explosion. Ultimately, the horizontal distance traveled by the moving fragment after the explosion can be computed based on these principles.
clucky
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey everyone! I'm a newbie here, how are you all today?
Anywho, I was doing my physics homework and I came across this question, and I'm stuck :( Can anyone tell me just how to start it?

A shell is shot with an initial velocity of 20 m/s, at an angle of 60 degrees with the horizontal. At the top of the trajectory, the shell explodes into two fragments of equal mass. One fragment, whose speed immediately after the explosion is zero, falls vertically. How far from the gun does the other fragment land, assuming that the terrain is level and that air drag is negligible?

Totally stuck! Don't even know where to start :(
Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
edit: scratch my idea. I have to think about this more.

2nd edit: ok. Assuming the the explosion means "breaks into two parts without making too much of a fuss" and air resistance is neglected the system's momentum's x-component is conserved and you can solve the x component of velocity of the half that keeps moving in the x-direction. Can you do it from here on?

If approached like this the problem is so unrealistic that I'm not sure if I'm giving you good advice. Maybe some of the official homework helpers could confirm this? It feels odd to think about a system that breaks up like this but since you can break up the equations of motions into components the system's momentum's x-component should be conserved.
 
Last edited:
clucky said:
Hey everyone! I'm a newbie here, how are you all today?
Anywho, I was doing my physics homework and I came across this question, and I'm stuck :( Can anyone tell me just how to start it?

A shell is shot with an initial velocity of 20 m/s, at an angle of 60 degrees with the horizontal. At the top of the trajectory, the shell explodes into two fragments of equal mass. One fragment, whose speed immediately after the explosion is zero, falls vertically. How far from the gun does the other fragment land, assuming that the terrain is level and that air drag is negligible?

Totally stuck! Don't even know where to start :(
Thanks for your help!

I will assume you can find the position of the shell at explosion. At that time the velocity is horizontal. Momentum will be conserved. Immediately after explosion one half of the shell will be at rest, then it falls. How fast and in what direction will the other half be moving immediately after the explosion? How does the horizontal distance traveled after explosion compare to the horizontal distance traveled before the explosion?
 
OlderDan said:
I will assume you can find the position of the shell at explosion. At that time the velocity is horizontal. Momentum will be conserved. Immediately after explosion one half of the shell will be at rest, then it falls. How fast and in what direction will the other half be moving immediately after the explosion? How does the horizontal distance traveled after explosion compare to the horizontal distance traveled before the explosion?

wahh! I doubted myself in vain.
 

Thread 'Errors and significant figures'

I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
View full post »
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'

Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
View full post »

Similar threads

Center of mass project exploding at max height
Replies
8
Views
2K
Projectile explosion velocity and direction of fragments
Replies
2
Views
7K
Conservation of Momentum in an Explosion
Replies
9
Views
5K
A shell explodes into two identical fragments; find v
Replies
2
Views
4K
Center of mass problem involving shell
Replies
7
Views
7K
Newton's Second Law for a System of Particles
Replies
5
Views
3K
Conservation of momentum question
Replies
1
Views
2K
Linear Conservation of Momentum
Replies
2
Views
2K
Trajectory of an exploding shell
Replies
2
Views
2K
How much energy is released in the explosion?
Replies
10
Views
3K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top