Solving a Puzzling Circuit: Find V2

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaspis245
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circuit
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around solving a circuit puzzle involving three equal resistors and three equal voltmeters, where V1 measures 10V and V3 measures 8V. Participants clarify that voltmeters read voltage, not resistance, and emphasize the need for nodal analysis to determine the unknown voltage V2. The final expression derived for V2 is V2 = (10n + 10n^2) / (1 + 3n + n^2), with participants suggesting that the value of n can be calculated from the voltage divider relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Ohm's Law
  • Familiarity with Kirchhoff's circuit laws
  • Knowledge of nodal analysis in electrical circuits
  • Basic concepts of voltage dividers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Kirchhoff's Voltage Law in complex circuits
  • Learn about nodal analysis techniques for solving circuit problems
  • Explore voltage divider circuits and their applications
  • Investigate the impact of voltmeter resistance on circuit measurements
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineering students, circuit designers, and anyone interested in solving complex circuit problems involving resistors and voltmeters.

  • #31
I had in mind the potential divider R & nR that produces V3 from V2. This allows you to express V3 in terms of V2 and n.

I'm not sure what gneill had in mind, but once you have calculated n I think you'll be as good as done.

Do you happen to know the correct answer?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
I don't know the answer.

At this point I am completely confused. Appreciate if you just write the solution. It would be much easier for me to understand. Is this correct:

## V_3=\frac{nR}{R+nR}⋅V_2 ##
 
  • #33
## \frac{nR}{R+nR}⋅V_2 = 8 ##

Now substitute your earlier expression for V2 and solve for the only unknown, n. A few things should cancel, making it easier than it looks. :wink:
 
  • #34
I get n=13.232. What now?
 
  • #35
I placed n into this equation:

## V_2= \frac{10n+10n^2}{1+n+n^2} ##

and got V2=8.73 V

Is this correct?
 
  • #36
kaspis245 said:
I get n=13.232. What now?
That's a bit off from what I'm seeing. But you've made excellent progress!

Myself, I didn't solve for n first, but rather substituted ##n = \frac{8}{v2 - 8}## from the voltage divider part into the node equation which then reduced to a pretty nice quadratic for v2.
 
  • #37
Sorry, I've recalculated it and got this equation:

## n^3-11n^2-16n-4=0 ##

Then let wolfram alpha do the work and got n=12.325

This way V2=9.94V

Is it correct?
 
  • #38
The value for n looks good. The value of V2 does not. What expression did you use?
 
  • #39
I used this expression:

## V_2= \frac{10n+10n^2}{1+3n+n^2} ##

which is derived from:

## \frac{10-V_2}{V_2}-\frac{V_2}{nR}-\frac{V_2}{R+nR}=0 ##
 
  • #40
kaspis245 said:
I used this expression:

## V_2= \frac{10n+10n^2}{1+3n+n^2} ##

which is derived from:

## \frac{10-V_2}{V_2}-\frac{V_2}{nR}-\frac{V_2}{R+nR}=0 ##
I presume that first term should be over R, not ##V_2##.
Okay, that should work. But I'm seeing a different value for ##V_2## using that equation.

I would have used the simpler voltage divider derived equation myself.
 
  • #41
I am such an idiot, I've made another mistake in my calculations.

Here's my final answer:

## V_2=8.65 V ##
 
  • #42
kaspis245 said:
Sorry, I've recalculated it and got this equation:

## n^3-11n^2-16n-4=0 ##

Then let wolfram alpha do the work and got n=12.325

This way V2=9.94V

Is it correct?
A cubic?? You have probably overlooked a term in the numerator which would have canceled a factor of this, leaving you with just a quadratic to solve.

n=12.325 is my answer, too, from the quadratic solution
 
  • #43
As long as we are getting the same answer I am ok with that :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K