Solving a Root Equation for the Variable r

  • Thread starter Thread starter thomas49th
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Root
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rearranging the equation A = πr² + r²√(k²-1) to solve for the variable r. Participants clarify that the common factor r² can be factored out, leading to the equation r²(π + √(k²-1)) = A. The next step involves dividing both sides by (π + √(k²-1)) and then taking the square root to isolate r, resulting in r = √(A / (π + √(k²-1))). The conversation also touches on other algebraic manipulations and the importance of handling square roots and surds correctly. Overall, the thread emphasizes the process of isolating variables in algebraic equations.
  • #51
That's impossible.
you have most likely miscopied the original problem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #52
Ok, must of done. Now interestly the next question on the paper is

Hence or otherwise sove

\frac{1}{x-2} + \frac{2}{x+4} = \frac{1}{3}

so I will EXPAND the fractions (or cross multiply)?
this will give me

9x = x² - 2x + 4x - 8
so this is a quadratic. - 9x

x² -7x + 8 = 0
(x + 1)(x-8) = 0
so x = -1 or x= 8

that correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #53
Which is a totally different issue altogether!
What you have there is an EQUATION, what you said before was that that equality was an IDENTITY (which is NOT correct).
 
  • #54
aha i see
to solve it then

\frac{1}{x-2} + \frac{2}{x+4} = \frac{1}{3}

so I will EXPAND the fractions (or cross multiply)?
this will give me

9x = x² - 2x + 4x - 8
so this is a quadratic. - 9x

x² -7x + 8 = 0
(x + 1)(x-8) = 0
so x = -1 or x= 8

that correct?
 
  • #55
Seems so, yes.
 
  • #56
O, right first time...

Now here's a hard one I don't get

Find the value of

m when \sqrt{128} = 2^{m}

I no straight away from binary that 2^7 is 128 does that help?
 
  • #57
Indeed it helps!
Remember how roots can be written as exponents..
 
  • #58
\frac{7}{2}

but how would i solve it normally?
 
Last edited:
  • #59
Indeed, that is what m equals, as soon as you get the LateX right..:smile:
 
  • #60
but say if i didn't know about binary how would i got about solving it
somthing to do with surds isn't it?
 
  • #61
In fact, perhaps your original post contained a typo. You went from
A = πr² + r²root(k²-1) to r³ = (2A/π+root(k²-1)
Did you really mean the r³, rather than r²?
 
  • #62
:redface: i believe your right
 
Back
Top