Solving a Sigmoid Function - Wolfram Alpha

  • Thread starter Thread starter inc7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on rewriting the sigmoid function, expressed as 1/(1 + e^-t), into an alternate form of 1 - 1/(1 + e^t). Participants suggest multiplying the numerator and denominator by e^t to facilitate the transformation. The rewritten form highlights the function's symmetry, demonstrating that f(t) + f(-t) = 1, which is not immediately apparent from the original expression. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical reasoning behind this alternate representation and its implications. Understanding this symmetry is crucial for deeper insights into the sigmoid function's properties.
inc7
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I'm working with the sigmoid function which is written

1/(1 + e^-t)

While plugging this into wolfram alpha, I noticed an alternate way to write it is

1 - 1/(1 + e^t)

I can't for the life of me figure out how to go about rewriting it in the alternate form. Would anyone be able to give me a hint on how to go about rewriting it this way? Or even better point me at some material that will help me figure it out? Thanks

Here is the link to wolfram alpha

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/(1+++exp(-t))
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Start by multipling the top and bottom of 1/(1 + e^-t) by e^t.
 
inc7 said:
Hi,
I'm working with the sigmoid function which is written

1/(1 + e^-t)

While plugging this into wolfram alpha, I noticed an alternate way to write it is

1 - 1/(1 + e^t)

I can't for the life of me figure out how to go about rewriting it in the alternate form. Would anyone be able to give me a hint on how to go about rewriting it this way? Or even better point me at some material that will help me figure it out? Thanks

Here is the link to wolfram alpha

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/(1+++exp(-t))

1/(1 + e-t) = 1/(1 + 1/et) = et/(1 + et) = (1 + et -1)/(1 + et) =

you can complete.

Nothing difficult, only thing difficult to understand maybe is why they want it in that form.
 
epenguin said:
1/(1 + e-t) = 1/(1 + 1/et) = et/(1 + et) = (1 + et -1)/(1 + et) =

you can complete.

Nothing difficult, only thing difficult to understand maybe is why they want it in that form.

Thanks guys. That helped. So to complete would you end up with

1/(1 + et) + 1et/(1 + et) - 1/(1 + et) = 1 - 1/(1 + et)
 
Last edited:
epenguin said:
Nothing difficult, only thing difficult to understand maybe is why they want it in that form.

It shows the function is "symmetrical" in the sense that f(t) + f(-t) = 1, which isn't obvious from either expression on its own.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top