1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Solving a Simple ODE from the Navier-Stokes

  1. Nov 5, 2006 #1
    I've reduced a portion of the Navier Stokes to solve a flow problem, and am left with the following ODE:

    [tex]u (\frac {\partial^2 Vz} {\partial^2 r}) + \frac {r} {u}\frac {\partial Vz} {\partial r} = 0 [/tex]

    I tried to solve this equation by assuming a power law solution with
    [tex]Vz = Cr^n [/tex]

    Which yields

    [tex] n(n-1)r^{n-2} + nr^{n-2} = 0 [/tex],

    Thus n^2 - n + n = 0

    Which seems to indicate [tex] n^2 =0 [/tex] => n = 0

    So Vz = C. But, I don't think this is what physically happens, Iam expecting a radial profile and not a flat profile, so I'm looking for where I took a wrong turn. Any ideas? Thanks.
    Last edited: Nov 5, 2006
  2. jcsd
  3. Nov 6, 2006 #2


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    HINT: Substitute [itex] \frac{\partial V_{z}}{\partial r} [/itex] by a new function, let's call it [itex] f(r,...) [/itex]. Then see what you get.

  4. Nov 6, 2006 #3
    So, using the hint I get:

    uf''(r) + (u/r)f'(r) = 0

    Assuming an exponential function,
    [tex]f(r) = e^{nr}[/tex]
    [tex]f'(r) = ne^{nr}[/tex]
    [tex]f''(r) = n^2e^{nr}[/tex]


    [tex]un^2e^{rn} + (u/r)ne^{rn} = 0[/tex]
    [tex]u(n^2+1/rn) = 0[/tex]
    [tex]un(n+1/r) = 0[/tex]
    [tex]n = 0, -1/r[/tex]

    [tex]Vz = Ae^{0} + Be^{-1/r} [/tex]

    Is that the correct methodology? Thanks again.
    Last edited: Nov 6, 2006
  5. Nov 7, 2006 #4


    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    I get the eq for "f"

    [tex] u\frac{df}{dr}+\frac{r}{u}f=0 [/tex]

    with the solution

    [tex] f(r)=Ce^{-\frac{r^{2}}{2u^{2}}} [/tex]

    and then finally

    [tex] V(r,\vartheta)=C\int Ce^{-\frac{r^{2}}{2u^{2}}} \ dr + g(\vartheta) [/tex]

    The integral brings in the erf function, while the angle dependence should be determined by boundary conditions.

Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?

Similar Discussions: Solving a Simple ODE from the Navier-Stokes
  1. Navier Stokes? (Replies: 0)

  2. Solve ode (Replies: 1)

  3. Solving an ODE (Replies: 7)