Solving a Simple ODE from the Navier-Stokes

  • Thread starter Thread starter Peregrine
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Navier-stokes Ode
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 3K views
Peregrine
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I've reduced a portion of the Navier Stokes to solve a flow problem, and am left with the following ODE:

[tex]u (\frac {\partial^2 Vz} {\partial^2 r}) + \frac {r} {u}\frac {\partial Vz} {\partial r} = 0[/tex]

I tried to solve this equation by assuming a power law solution with
[tex]Vz = Cr^n[/tex]

Which yields

[tex]n(n-1)r^{n-2} + nr^{n-2} = 0[/tex],

Thus n^2 - n + n = 0

Which seems to indicate [tex]n^2 =0[/tex] => n = 0

So Vz = C. But, I don't think this is what physically happens, Iam expecting a radial profile and not a flat profile, so I'm looking for where I took a wrong turn. Any ideas? Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT: Substitute [itex]\frac{\partial V_{z}}{\partial r}[/itex] by a new function, let's call it [itex]f(r,...)[/itex]. Then see what you get.

Daniel.
 
So, using the hint I get:

uf''(r) + (u/r)f'(r) = 0

Assuming an exponential function,
[tex]f(r) = e^{nr}[/tex]
[tex]f'(r) = ne^{nr}[/tex]
[tex]f''(r) = n^2e^{nr}[/tex]

Thus

[tex]un^2e^{rn} + (u/r)ne^{rn} = 0[/tex]
[tex]u(n^2+1/rn) = 0[/tex]
[tex]un(n+1/r) = 0[/tex]
[tex]n = 0, -1/r[/tex]

So:
[tex]Vz = Ae^{0} + Be^{-1/r}[/tex]

Is that the correct methodology? Thanks again.
 
Last edited:
I get the eq for "f"

[tex]u\frac{df}{dr}+\frac{r}{u}f=0[/tex]

with the solution

[tex]f(r)=Ce^{-\frac{r^{2}}{2u^{2}}}[/tex]

and then finally

[tex]V(r,\vartheta)=C\int Ce^{-\frac{r^{2}}{2u^{2}}} \ dr + g(\vartheta)[/tex]

The integral brings in the erf function, while the angle dependence should be determined by boundary conditions.

Daniel.