Solving a Statics Problem: Finding Reactions Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rumpelstiltzkin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Statics
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a statics problem involving a system in static equilibrium, where participants are tasked with finding the reaction forces at various points. The original poster presents their calculations and assumptions regarding the reaction forces, particularly focusing on the vertical and horizontal components.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of assuming certain reaction forces to be zero based on the diagram. Questions are raised about the implications of having more unknowns than equations and the physical attachment of points in the system.

Discussion Status

There is an active exchange of ideas regarding the assumptions made by the original poster. Some participants suggest that certain reaction forces may be zero under specific conditions, while others challenge these assumptions and seek further clarification. The discussion is ongoing, with no clear consensus yet reached.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the potential lack of information in the problem statement and the implications of assuming a frictionless system. The original poster's approach is scrutinized, particularly regarding the inspection of the diagram and the assumptions made about the reaction forces.

Rumpelstiltzkin
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
PinWrench.jpg


Here's a statics problem that I'm unsure about. The system is in static equilibrium, and I'm supposed to find the reaction forces.

{convention: right and up are taken as positive for x and y respectively, and counter-clockwise is positive for moment}

[tex]\sum F_{y} = 0[/tex]
[tex]B_{y} = -1000N[/tex]

[tex]\sum F_{x} = 0[/tex]
[tex]A_{x} + B_{x} = 0[/tex]

Taking the sum of moment at the centre of the circular thingy
[tex]\sum M_{z} = 0[/tex]
[tex]0 = -0.05(A_{x}) + 0.05(B_{y}) - 0.25(1000)[/tex]

[tex]A_{x} = -6000 N[/tex]
[tex]B_{x} = 6000 N[/tex]

I solved this problem assuming [tex]A_{y} = 0[/tex], by inspecting the diagram. Is that alright? In cases where it's not as obvious, how do I determine which reactions are not supposed to be considered? I think I must be neglecting something small.

Thanks in advance.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't just randomly consider a reaction force to be 0. I'm not sure how you inspected the diagram to come to that conclusion.

It comes down to you having 4 unknown reaction forces ([tex]A_x,A_y,B_x,B_y[/tex]) and only 3 equations of equilibrium ([tex]\sum F_{y} = 0[/tex], [tex]\sum F_{x} = 0[/tex],[tex]\sum M = 0[/tex]) Like you said, you have to find some other equation based on other information.

By looking closer at the diagram it appears as if point B is not physically attached to the circle. That would suggest that it is free to move vertically so [tex]B_y=0[/tex]. It's hard to say from that diagram though.

Does anyone have a second opinion?

(By the way, welcome to PF and thanks for showing your work and making it very clear)

Edit: Also, when you summed the forces in the y direction I think you missed a negative sign.
 
Last edited:
I solved this problem assuming Ay = 0, by inspecting the diagram.
I don't think you can assume that, infact I think the opposite, for the system to remain static Ay must be non zero. Perhaps I am wrong, could you post your thought processes.
dav2008 said:
By looking closer at the diagram it appears as if point B is not physically attached to the circle. That would suggest that it is free to move vertically so [tex]B_y=0[/tex]. It's hard to say from that diagram though.
Does anyone have a second opinion?
I would agree with you there dav. We can say that By = 0 if we assume that the system is frictionless, which seems like a reasnable assumtion as we are not given any coefficents. I am also assuming ofcourse that the spanner is light.

So now you have three unknowns and three equations. Happy Days :smile: I also would like to comend you on your post, all the required information was provided and it is presented in a clear logical fashion, a pleasure to read.
 
Last edited:
Definetly agree with the replies, but i will also want to request the problem statement, maybe there's more info there?
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K