Solving Absolute Value Inequalities without Changing Directions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the absolute value inequality |1/(x-1)| < 1. Participants explore various methods to interpret and solve the inequality, questioning the implications of manipulating the expression and considering the behavior of the function involved.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the equivalence of the original inequality to the double inequality -1 < 1/(x-1) < 1 and question the validity of their manipulations. Some suggest using sign charts to analyze the intervals where the inequality holds true. Others propose graphing the relation on a number line to clarify the solution path.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants offering various approaches and questioning each other's reasoning. Some guidance has been provided regarding the use of sign charts and the importance of considering the continuity of the function at critical points. However, there is no explicit consensus on the final solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the inequality may change at specific points, particularly x = 0, x = 1, and x = 2, and emphasize the need to check values in different intervals to determine where the inequality holds.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


|1/(x-1)|<1

The Attempt at a Solution


is that the same as this -1<1/(x-1)<1

can i do each side by it self then take the values at which they intersect

so i subtracted the 1 then got (-x+2)/(x-1) then made a sign chart with 2 and 1 on it
then took the less than terms so i got (1,2) for the first suoltions
then for the second i got x/(x-1) then made a sign chart with 0 and 1 on it
then i took the greater than terms geting (-inf,0) U (1,inf)
is this right
 
Physics news on Phys.org
is that the same as this -1<1/(x-1)<1

Well, let's check. Suppose x = 0. Does this inequality hold? No because -1 = -1.

Maybe this will help:

|x| < y
=> x < y or -x > -y
 
ok i see so you took x<y then divided it by a -1 and then flipped the sign
so then would our soultions to my original inequality be
(-inf,1) U (2,inf)
 
A shorter idea (for future reference)
<br /> |x| &lt; y<br />

is the same as
<br /> -y &lt; x &lt; y<br />

If your problem begins with \le then replace &lt; with \le in the simplification.
 
would we then have to do a sign chart
 
Last edited:
crager,
Look again at Dunkle's first response. Graph the relation on a number line and you may more clearly find a path to a solution of his example and to your exercise problem.

In your original expression on the left, the expression inside of the absolute value is either positive, or negative; examine each of these conditions separately. Do you yet need more detailed descriptions?
 
(-inf,-2) U (2,inf) is this the answer
 
Reread post #6 and #2. Check your answer.
 
Start with |y|<1, where y = 1/(x-1).

Use a number line to help understand this:
Either y<1 OR -y<1.

Replace y with the original expression and solve, and check or first solve for y and then replace y with the original expression and finish solving.
...but be careful. I'm not absolutely sure about my own answer, so I might have made a conceptual error. Still, not that for the particular exercise, x canNOT be 1.
 
  • #10
In my opinion, the simplest way to solve most inequalities is to first solve the associated equation. |1/(x-1)|= 1 reduces to 1/(x-1)= 1 or 1/(x-1)= -1. Multiplying both sides of each gives 1= x-1 and 1= 1- x. In the first case, x= 2 and in the second x= 0. The point of that is that continuous functions can change from "<" to ">" on where they are "=". Of course, |1/(x-1)| is NOT continuous at x= 1 so we must add that possibility: the inequality can change at x= 0, x= 1, and x= 2. If we take x= -1< 0, |1/(-1-1)|= 1/2< 1 so the given inequality is true for all x< 0. Check a value of x between 0 and 1, a value of x between 1 and 2, and a value of x larger than 2 to determine which of those intervals also satisfy the inequality.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K