Solving Atwood Machine: m1 & m2 Reaching Floor & Ascending Height

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an Atwood machine problem involving two masses, m1 and m2, with specific weights and a distance between them. The original poster seeks to determine the time it takes for m2 to reach the floor and the height to which m1 ascends after m2 hits the ground.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for acceleration and time taken for m2 to reach the floor. There are questions about the appropriate equations to use for determining the height m1 ascends after m2 hits the ground. Some participants express uncertainty about the forces acting on m1 at that moment.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the problem, with participants providing insights and prompting further consideration of the dynamics involved. Some have suggested looking at the situation from different perspectives, particularly regarding the motion of m1 after m2 impacts the floor.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of maintaining precision in calculations to avoid rounding errors. There is also a mention of the original poster's background in biochemistry, indicating a personal interest in the topic rather than a homework requirement.

DmytriE
Messages
78
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



One mass, m1 = 215g, of an ideal Atwood machine rests on the floor 1.10m below the other mass, m2 = 255g. (a) If the masses are released from rest, how long does it take m2 to reach the floor? (b) How high will mass m1 ascend from the floor?

Known variables:
m1 = 215g = 0.215kg = F1
m2 = 255g = 0.255kg = F2
yd = 1.10m

Homework Equations


F2 - F1 = (m1 + m2)a
yd = v0t + 1/2at2

The Attempt at a Solution



A.
2.5N - 2.1N = (0.255kg + 0.215kg)*a
0.4N = 0.47kg*a
a = 0.851m/s2

1.10m = 1/2*(0.851m/s2)*t2
t = 1.61s

B. I think I have to use equation 'b' in the relevant equations section but I do not know how to use it properly. For this part I have the masses or each object, the acceleration of the entire apparatus, and the different forces. Any insight on this problem would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi DmytriE.

You might want to keep a few more decimal places in your intermediate values so that rounding errors don't creep into your results.

You may need to think about recruiting some additional equations for part (B). When m2 hits the floor at the time t that you've calculated, what happens to the forces acting on m1? What's m1's state of motion at that instant?
 
That's the problem. I don't know what other equations I need to use to figure out this problem. This is what I have:

a = 0.834 m/s2
v0 = 0 m/s
t = 1.62s
x = 1.10 m

As m2 is accelerating downward toward the ground m1 is accelerating upward. It will continue to accelerate for 1.10m (the point where m2 hits the ground) and then m1 begins to slow down.

xm1 = 1.10 + the distance it takes for a = 0.

Maybe I should be looking at a different acceleration for m1 since it's lighter than m2? m1 should accelerate quicker than m2.


NOTE: I have just graduated college with a BA in biochemistry. This is no longer homework for me but an interest and a learning experience. I will not be getting homework points. :smile:
 
DmytriE said:
That's the problem. I don't know what other equations I need to use to figure out this problem. This is what I have:

a = 0.834 m/s2
v0 = 0 m/s
t = 1.62s
x = 1.10 m

As m2 is accelerating downward toward the ground m1 is accelerating upward. It will continue to accelerate for 1.10m (the point where m2 hits the ground) and then m1 begins to slow down.

xm1 = 1.10 + the distance it takes for a = 0.

Maybe I should be looking at a different acceleration for m1 since it's lighter than m2? m1 should accelerate quicker than m2.

As long as the Atwood machine's parts are free from external interference they will move together -- the same velocity and the same acceleration. The string will remain tensioned.

When m2 hits the floor, m1 continues its upward journey and the string (presumably the much vaunted "light inextensible string" of physics folklore) will go slack. At this point m1 is behaving as a projectile fired upwards with whatever velocity it had attained immediately before m2 hit the floor. So to go further you need:

1. The height when m1 is "launched" (you have this)
2. The velocity of m1 when it is "launched"
3. The new situation for forces acting on m1 after launch
4. Appropriate projectile motion equations (Hint: conservation of energy would help here)

NOTE: I have just graduated college with a BA in biochemistry. This is no longer homework for me but an interest and a learning experience. I will not be getting homework points. :smile:

That's most commendable. Won't change what happens here though! :smile:
 
I understand gneill. Your post had me look at the problem in an entirely different way. Thanks!

Sometimes a day or two off helps reset the brain.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
16K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K