Solving Box & Ramp Problem at 50° Angle

  • Thread starter Thread starter mrjeffy321
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Ramp
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the acceleration components of a box on a frictionless ramp at a 50° angle after being given an initial velocity of 10 m/s. Participants clarify that the gravitational acceleration remains constant at -9.81 m/s² and does not change based on the box's mass. The confusion arises from attempting to break down the gravitational force into X and Y components, which is unnecessary since gravity acts vertically downward. The conversation emphasizes that the acceleration due to gravity is independent of mass and should be treated as a single force acting on the box. Ultimately, the participants agree that the calculations for the box's motion need to focus on the overall gravitational force rather than attempting to resolve it into components.
mrjeffy321
Science Advisor
Messages
876
Reaction score
1
Lets say you have a box at the bottom of a frictionless ramp and you give it a velocity (X) of let's say 10 m/s, so that when it gets on the ramp, the components velocities would be:
Vx = 10 * cos (angle)
Vy = 10 * sin (angle)

then once it gets ontp the ramp, the gravitational acceleration changes from
being -9.81 m/s^2 down (Y) to a combination of X and Y acceleration.

I am trying to find the X and Y acceleration, I have been looking at the diagram of the ramp and box and have drawn my force lines to indicate which direction everything has a force exserted on it, but when I goto calculate the acceleration I get very confused.

So let's just say in this example the ramp is at an angle of 50 degrees, the box has in initial X velocity (before the ramp) of 10 m/s and we will esimate gravitational acceleration at -10 m/s^2.
so we now have the box on the ramp with:
Vx = 10 * cos (60) = 5 m/s
Vy = 10 * sin (60) = 8.7 m/s

acceleration X = ? -10 * sin (60) = -8.7 m/s^2 ?
acceleration Y = ? -10 * cos (60) = -5 m/s^2 ?

is that right? or is it:

acceleration Y = ? -10 * sin (60) = -8.7 m/s^2 ?
acceleration X = ? -10 * cos (60) = -5 m/s^2 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Define your coordinate system as X is parrallel to the ramp and Y is parrallel to the normal force.


Then: F=ma and F due to grav is mg.
I think you might be confused because your box is massless. You have to sum your forces, don't try adding accelerations.
 
OK, I get that now,

so to find the acceleration in a particular direction use the opposite (sin/cos) finction that you used to find its velocity in that difrection.
so it would be:
acceleration X = ? -10 * sin (60) = -8.7 m/s^2 ?
acceleration Y = ? -10 * cos (60) = -5 m/s^2 ?

this is what I was afraid of, that just caused more problem than it solved, because in the long run of this problem, I am trying to find the angle of the ramp, and the distance traveled in each direction (X and Y).
 
I don't think this can be done without a mass of the box.

Do you have the actual text of the problem?
 
No, the mass of the box is not needed in the problem, I am pretty sure of that (it isn't give anyway). I do have the actual text of the problem, an I can give it to you if you want, but I was trying to maintain a certain degree of integrity with this by doing it myself.

I will tell you what it wants:
basicaly, the problem gives you a box at a ramp with an initial horizontal velocity (which you then convert to its componet velocity), and it gives you a distance traveled (X). it then asks you to find the angle of the ramp and the distance traveled (Y) and the time it takes.

I assume that I can use the formula: Vf = Vi + a * t, to find the time, and thus the distance traved along with this formula, d = (Vi * t) + (1/2*a*t^2).
but then I ran across this other way of finding the angle:
angle = tan^-1 (Force applied / Force gravity)
and you can get the force applied by using the formula:
Vf^2 = Vi^2 + 2 * a * d
 
But the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity is directly related to the mass...

Well then, I am confused. Oh well!
 
o great, now I have spreak my confusion to the only other person who was helping me.

the magnitude of acceleration is related to the angle of the slope. the magnitude of the force is realated to the mass. but in this problem, I don't care about force.



Here is what I got for an answer, but I am almost certain that it is wrong.
Dx = 5.1 m
Dy = 8.6 m
angle = 59 degrees
time = 1 second up, 1 second down

I say that it is almost certainly wrong because I got that back when I still wasnt sure how to correctly calculate the component accelerations, and I thing I did it wrong.
 
Gmaximus said:
But the magnitude of the acceleration due to gravity is directly related to the mass...

Well then, I am confused. Oh well!

Yes, you are very confused. The acceleration due to gravity on an object is independent of the object's mass!

(The force is proportional to the object's mass but then F= ma.)
 
[QU0TE= mrjeffy321]"then once it gets ontp the ramp, the gravitational acceleration changes from
being -9.81 m/s^2 down (Y) to a combination of X and Y acceleration."

No. Since you have changed the velocity (up the slope) to
Vx = 10 * cos (60) = 5 m/s
Vy = 10 * sin (60) = 8.7 m/s (the "speed" up the ramp is 10 m/s)
it is clear that x and y here are horizontal and vertical. The acceleration is still
Ax= 0, Ay= -9.81.
 
  • #10
HallsofIvy said:
Yes, you are very confused. The acceleration due to gravity on an object is independent of the object's mass!

(The force is proportional to the object's mass but then F= ma.)


Oh, Duh. I shouldn't try to help people so late at night.

Obviously, g is constant for everything. Funny how stupid i can be.

Sorry Mr.Jeffy, I sincerely apologize for confounding you further.
 
  • #11
so I shouldn't be trying to change the acceleration into X and Y acceleration, i should leave it as all Y.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K