Solving Complex Velocity from Particle Falling in Gravity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving the equations of motion for a particle falling under gravity with air drag proportional to the square of its velocity. Participants explore the implications of using Lagrangian mechanics versus Newtonian mechanics, and the resulting equations of motion, including issues related to signs in the equations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents a derivation leading to a complex velocity, questioning the validity of their approach.
  • Another participant points out a potential sign error in the drag force equation, suggesting that the drag force should act upwards against the direction of motion.
  • A different participant agrees that there is a sign issue in the equation of motion, proposing that the correct formulation should reflect the net force as gravity minus drag.
  • One participant acknowledges the possibility of changing the sign of either the drag force or the potential energy, but not both simultaneously, as both yield the same equation.
  • Another participant reflects on their misunderstanding of the unit vector in the drag force expression, realizing that their initial assumption about the direction was incorrect.
  • One participant clarifies that while the expression for drag is correct, the direction of the forces must be consistent with the chosen coordinate system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the correct formulation of the equations of motion, particularly concerning the signs of the forces involved. There is no consensus on the best approach, as some advocate for Lagrangian mechanics while others prefer Newtonian methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of consistent definitions for direction and force in their equations, indicating that the choice of coordinate system affects the interpretation of the forces involved.

fobos3
Messages
33
Reaction score
1
I'm trying to derive the equations of motion for a particle falling in a uniform gravitational fill with air drag proportional to the square of velocity. However I'm getting the velocity as a complex number. Here is what I've done

The force of friction is F=-k\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2\dfrac{\textbf{v}}{||\textbf{v}||}=-k\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2

We put the particle stationary at x=0

The Lagrangian is \mathcal{L}=\dfrac{1}{2}m\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2-mgx

\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\dfrac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{x}}\right)-\dfrac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x}=-k\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2

m\dfrac{d^2 x}{dt^2}+mg=-k\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2

If we put c=\dfrac{k}{m}

\dfrac{d^2x}{dt^2}+c\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2+g=0

We put p=\dfrac{dx}{dt}

We have \dfrac{d^2x}{dt^2}=\dfrac{dp}{dt}=\dfrac{dp}{dx}\dfrac{dx}{dt}=\dfrac{dp}{dx}p

The differential equation becomes

\dfrac{dp}{dx}p+cp^2+g=0

\dfrac{p}{cp^2+g}\dfrac{dp}{dx}=-1

\int\dfrac{p}{cp^2+g}\,dp=-x

To solve the integral we put u=cp^2+g

\dfrac{du}{dp}=2cp

p=\dfrac{1}{2c}\dfrac{du}{dp}

\dfrac{1}{2c}\int \dfrac{1}{u}\,du=-x

\int \dfrac{1}{u}\,du=\ln |u|=\ln u because u>0

\dfrac{1}{2c}\ln (cp^2+g)+A=-x

A(cp^2+g)=e^{-2cx}

At t=0,x=0,p=0

Ag=1

A=\dfrac{1}{g}

\dfrac{c}{g}p^2+1=e^{-2cx}

p^2=\dfrac{g(e^{-2cx}-1)}{c}

Now the sign of \dfrac{g(e^{-2cx}-1)}{c} is determined by e^{-2cx}-1 which is not necessary positive definite.

In fact if we put c=1,x=1 we get e^{-2}-1<0 which means that p\in \mathbb{C}

But p=\dfrac{dx}{dt} which makes no sense at all. Did I do something wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
fobos3 said:
\dfrac{d}{dt}\left(\dfrac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{x}}\right)-\dfrac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial x}=-k\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2

The sign of the drag force in the above equation is wrong.
By the way, I don't see why we have to use Lagrangian here, since Newtonian method is much more simple.

EDIT: Actually you may change either the sign of the drag force or the sign of the potential energy, but only one of them. Both yield the same correct equation.
 
Last edited:
fobos3 said:
m\dfrac{d^2 x}{dt^2}+mg=-k\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2

I think you have a sign issue here. Shouldn't it be:

m\dfrac{d^2 x}{dt^2}=mg-k\left(\dfrac{dx}{dt}\right)^2

Mass*acceleration equals the sum of the forces. The net force is gravity minus drag.
 
hikaru1221 said:
The sign of the drag force in the above equation is wrong.
By the way, I don't see why we have to use Lagrangian here, since Newtonian method is much more simple.

EDIT: Actually you may change either the sign of the drag force or the sign of the potential energy, but only one of them. Both yield the same correct equation.

Yes I see that now. Can you explain where I went wrong in my derivation of the friction.This is what I thought

F=-k\dot{x}^2 \hat{\textbf{v}}

\hat{\textbf{v}}=\dfrac{\textbf{v}}{||\textbf{v}||}=\dfrac{(\dot{x})}{\dot{x}}=(1)

Where the brackets denote a vector in the x direction.

Now obviously \hat{\textbf{v}}=(1) is wrong, because the particle accelerates in the negative direction, but why?

Edit
Never mind. I find out on my own.
 
Last edited:
There is nothing wrong with \vec{F}=-kv^2\hat{v}. But you must be careful when jotting down F = -kv^2 (*) (that means F<0). Since the ball is falling, the force must act upwards. So when you write (*), that means the positive direction of x-axis is downward.
Now in order that potential energy V = mgx, the x-axis must point upwards, which is inconsistent with (*) as explained above.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
921
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K