Solving Det(A) in an Invertible 5x5 Matrix with Adjoints

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix
Click For Summary
To solve for det(A) in the context of an invertible 5x5 matrix where adj(adj(A)) = A, the adjoint's definition is crucial, but the complexity of calculations may hinder progress. Simplifying the problem by leveraging properties of 5x5 matrices could provide clarity. For the second part, the span of the vectors u1, u2, and u3 is indeed equal to the span of v1, v2, and v3, as the latter are defined in terms of the former. The key consideration is whether v1, v2, and v3 maintain linear independence, which is essential for confirming their span equivalence. Understanding the relationship between the determinant and the adjoint matrix is vital for both parts of the problem.
daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a)A is an invertible 5x5 matrix with complex elements. Find all the values of det(A) where adj(adj(A)) = A. Use the definition of the adjoint (transpose of cofactor matrix)

b) u1,u2,u3 are linearly independent vectors in V. We define:
v1=u1+u2+u3, v2=u1-u2+u3, v3=-u1+3u3-u3
Does Sp{u1,u2,u3}=Sp{v1,v2.v3} ?


Homework Equations


a) The definition of adj(A)
b) If A and B are subsets of space V then Sp(A) = SP(B) iff A is in Sp(B) and B is in Sp(A).


The Attempt at a Solution


a) I tried to use the definition of the adjoint to find the adjoint of adj(A) but it quickly got so complicated that I couldn't see how to calculate det(A) from it. Is there a way to use the fact that A is a 5x5 matrix to simplify things?
b)I think that the answer is yes because obviously {v1,v2,v3} is in the span of {u1,u2,u3} because of their definition. And by solving the equation:
[v1|v2|v3][x]=[un] for all 0<n<=3 I can show that every u is a linear combination of v's and so {u1,u2,u3} is in Sp{v1,v2,v3}. Is that right?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you say you used the definition of adj(A), do you mearn you used the definition, or the formula? adj(A), is the (unique for det=/=0) matrix satisfying A*adj(A)= det(A)*Id.
 
I mean the formula: [adjA]_{ij} = (-1)^{i+j}*M_{ji}
Where M_{ji} is the minor (ji). (by minor (j,i) I mean the det of the matrix obtained by taking away the jth row and the ith coloum)
 
yes, I know that what was you used. I didn't ask for my benefit.
 
Now, what relation does det(A) have to [adjA]_{ij} = (-1)^{i+j}*M_{ji}?

As for B, you were told that u1, u2, and u3 are linearly independent. That means they are a basis for their span which must be of dimension 3. The real question is "Are v1, v2, and v3 linearly independent?"
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K