Solving Differential Equation with Laguerre Polynomials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around identifying the differential equation that the function \(\phi_n (x) := e^{-x/2} L_n (x)\), where \(L_n\) represents a Laguerre polynomial, solves. Participants are exploring the properties of Laguerre polynomials and their associated differential equations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the differential equation for \(\phi_n (x)\) based on its relationship with Laguerre polynomials. Questions arise regarding the self-adjoint nature of the resulting equation and whether it aligns with known forms of differential equations associated with Laguerre polynomials.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the properties of the Laguerre differential equation and its solutions. Some have offered guidance on how to relate the derivatives of \(\phi_n\) to those of \(L_n\), while others are questioning the self-adjointness of the derived equations.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the self-adjoint property of the differential equation being sought, which is a specific requirement for the original poster. Participants are also navigating the implications of potential mistakes in their calculations and assumptions about the nature of the equations involved.

Logarythmic
Messages
277
Reaction score
0
What differential equation does

[tex]\phi_n (x) := e^{-x/2} L_n (x)[/tex]

solve? [tex]L_n[/tex] is a Laguerre polynomial.

Please give me a hint on this one. I haven't got a clue where to start.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What differential equation do the Laguerre polynomials solve? If you don't know, look it up.
 
The Laguerre differential equation is

[tex]xy'' + (1 - x)y' + ny = 0[/tex]

and [tex]L_n (x)[/tex] is a solution to this but my [tex]\phi_n (x)[/tex] is not a solution to the Laguerre equation, is it?
I know that [tex]\phi_n (x)[/tex] should solve a self adjoint differential equation but I don't think the Laguerre eq. is?
 
Find [itex]\phi',\phi''[/itex] in terms of the derivatives of L and use the differential equation relating the derivatives of L to get a DE relating the derivatives of [itex]\phi[/itex].
 
Ok, so then I get

[tex]x \phi_n^{''} (x) + (1-x) \phi_n^{'} + (n + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{x}{4}) \phi_n (x) = 0[/tex]

but this isn't self-adjoint?
In my case, self-adjoint means it can be written in the form

[tex]\frac{d}{dx} (p(x) \frac{d}{dx} \phi_n (x) ) + q(x) \phi_n (x)[/tex]
 
I made a mistake. The equation I get is

[tex]x \phi_n^{''} + \phi_n^{'} + (n + \frac{1}{2} - \frac{x}{4}) \phi_n = 0[/tex]

and this is indeed self-adjoint. Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K