Solving for 2 unknowns, 2 equations in rectangular form

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving for two unknowns, I(a) and I(b), using two equations presented in rectangular form. The equations are derived from a circuit analysis context.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore different methods for solving the equations, including substitution and conversion to polar form. Some express confusion over the complexity of their attempts and question the validity of their steps.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's approaches, offering suggestions for re-evaluating their methods. There is a mix of attempts to clarify steps and a recognition of the challenges posed by the equations.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the conversion between rectangular and polar forms, with some participants questioning the necessity of such conversions in their calculations. The complexity of the equations and the potential for mistakes in manipulation are also noted.

stau40
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find I(a) and I(b) for the equaions below:
90 = -j5(I(a)) + j25(I(b))
60 = (20+j5)(I(a)) - j5(I(b))


Homework Equations


Equations in rectangular form


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried solving this for one variable and then plugging the answer into the second equation, but it gets extremely messy. Is there an easier way to solve for the 2 unknowns? Would it help to convert into polar form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi stau40! :wink:
stau40 said:
Find I(a) and I(b) for the equaions below:
90 = -j5(I(a)) + j25(I(b))
60 = (20+j5)(I(a)) - j5(I(b))

I've tried solving this for one variable and then plugging the answer into the second equation, but it gets extremely messy.

it shouldn't … show us what you've done :smile:
 
I tried to solve for I(b) first and ended up with the equation:
I(b) = (60-(20+j5)(I(a))/-j5)
and then plugged that into the first equation and found:
90 = (60-(20-j1)I(a))(j25) - j5(I(a))
At this point it seemed like I was doing something wrong because of the complexity so that's when I started to double check, but didn't find anything.
 
stau40 said:
I tried to solve for I(b) first and ended up with the equation:
I(b) = (60-(20+j5)(I(a))/-j5)
and then plugged that into the first equation and found:
90 = (60-(20-j1)I(a))(j25) - j5(I(a))

hmm … don't know how you got that complicated bit :confused:

start again, and just add 5 times the second equation to the first :wink:
stau40 said:
90 = -j5(I(a)) + j25(I(b))
60 = (20+j5)(I(a)) - j5(I(b))

… what do you get? :smile:
 
I have followed your instructions and end up with:
I(a) = (390/(100+j25) = (390/(103.08angle(14.04)) = 3.78angle(14.04)

I then plug this number into the first equation and get:
90 = -j5(3.78angle(14.04)) + j25(I(b))

I'm trying to convert -j5 into an angle to multiply, but arctan of -5/0 obviously can't be calculated. Am I doing something wrong?
 
stau40 said:
I have followed your instructions and end up with:
I(a) = (390/(100+j25)

(shouldn't that be j20 ?)

stop converting to polar! :rolleyes:

just use 1/(A + jB) = (A - jB)/(A - jB)(A + jB) = (A - jB)/(A2 + B2) :wink:
 
Using that formula I end up with I(a) = .01 + j20

I then plug I(a) into the second equation and get:
90 = .01-j100 + j25(I(b))

Do I need to convert to polar form now in order to solve for I(b)?
 
stau40 said:
Using that formula I end up with I(a) = .01 + j20

how?? :confused:
Do I need to convert to polar form now in order to solve for I(b)?

what is it with you and polar form? :rolleyes:

no!
 
I get I(a) by:
(100-j20)/(100^2 + 20^2) = .0096-j20

I keep switching to polar form because I thought it was easier to multipy/divide when the numbers were in polar form rather then rectangular form?
 
  • #10
stau40 said:
I get I(a) by:
(100-j20)/(100^2 + 20^2) = .0096-j20

hmm … the .0096 looks right …

but how did the j20 manage to sail through all that unscathed? :smile:
I keep switching to polar form because I thought it was easier to multipy/divide when the numbers were in polar form rather then rectangular form?

yes it is sometimes

but i think you need to get used to doing it the rectangular way first, without mistakes :wink:

(btw, i'd do 390/(100 + j20) by saying it's 390/20(5+j) = (5-j)390/20(25+1) :wink:)
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K