Solving for 2 unknowns, 2 equations in rectangular form

In summary, the equation for I(b) is (60-(20+j5)(I(a))-j5(I(b)) and the equation for I(a) is (390/(100+j25))
  • #1
stau40
37
0

Homework Statement


Find I(a) and I(b) for the equaions below:
90 = -j5(I(a)) + j25(I(b))
60 = (20+j5)(I(a)) - j5(I(b))


Homework Equations


Equations in rectangular form


The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried solving this for one variable and then plugging the answer into the second equation, but it gets extremely messy. Is there an easier way to solve for the 2 unknowns? Would it help to convert into polar form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
hi stau40! :wink:
stau40 said:
Find I(a) and I(b) for the equaions below:
90 = -j5(I(a)) + j25(I(b))
60 = (20+j5)(I(a)) - j5(I(b))

I've tried solving this for one variable and then plugging the answer into the second equation, but it gets extremely messy.

it shouldn't … show us what you've done :smile:
 
  • #3
I tried to solve for I(b) first and ended up with the equation:
I(b) = (60-(20+j5)(I(a))/-j5)
and then plugged that into the first equation and found:
90 = (60-(20-j1)I(a))(j25) - j5(I(a))
At this point it seemed like I was doing something wrong because of the complexity so that's when I started to double check, but didn't find anything.
 
  • #4
stau40 said:
I tried to solve for I(b) first and ended up with the equation:
I(b) = (60-(20+j5)(I(a))/-j5)
and then plugged that into the first equation and found:
90 = (60-(20-j1)I(a))(j25) - j5(I(a))

hmm … don't know how you got that complicated bit :confused:

start again, and just add 5 times the second equation to the first :wink:
stau40 said:
90 = -j5(I(a)) + j25(I(b))
60 = (20+j5)(I(a)) - j5(I(b))

… what do you get? :smile:
 
  • #5
I have followed your instructions and end up with:
I(a) = (390/(100+j25) = (390/(103.08angle(14.04)) = 3.78angle(14.04)

I then plug this number into the first equation and get:
90 = -j5(3.78angle(14.04)) + j25(I(b))

I'm trying to convert -j5 into an angle to multiply, but arctan of -5/0 obviously can't be calculated. Am I doing something wrong?
 
  • #6
stau40 said:
I have followed your instructions and end up with:
I(a) = (390/(100+j25)

(shouldn't that be j20 ?)

stop converting to polar! :rolleyes:

just use 1/(A + jB) = (A - jB)/(A - jB)(A + jB) = (A - jB)/(A2 + B2) :wink:
 
  • #7
Using that formula I end up with I(a) = .01 + j20

I then plug I(a) into the second equation and get:
90 = .01-j100 + j25(I(b))

Do I need to convert to polar form now in order to solve for I(b)?
 
  • #8
stau40 said:
Using that formula I end up with I(a) = .01 + j20

how?? :confused:
Do I need to convert to polar form now in order to solve for I(b)?

what is it with you and polar form? :rolleyes:

no!
 
  • #9
I get I(a) by:
(100-j20)/(100^2 + 20^2) = .0096-j20

I keep switching to polar form because I thought it was easier to multipy/divide when the numbers were in polar form rather then rectangular form?
 
  • #10
stau40 said:
I get I(a) by:
(100-j20)/(100^2 + 20^2) = .0096-j20

hmm … the .0096 looks right …

but how did the j20 manage to sail through all that unscathed? :smile:
I keep switching to polar form because I thought it was easier to multipy/divide when the numbers were in polar form rather then rectangular form?

yes it is sometimes

but i think you need to get used to doing it the rectangular way first, without mistakes :wink:

(btw, i'd do 390/(100 + j20) by saying it's 390/20(5+j) = (5-j)390/20(25+1) :wink:)
 

Related to Solving for 2 unknowns, 2 equations in rectangular form

1. How do you solve for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form?

To solve for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form, you can use the method of substitution or elimination. In substitution, you solve for one variable in one equation and substitute its value into the other equation. In elimination, you manipulate the equations to eliminate one variable and solve for the remaining variable.

2. Can you solve for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form using a graph?

Yes, you can solve for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form using a graph. Plot both equations on the same graph and the intersection point of the two lines will be the solution to the system of equations.

3. What is the importance of solving for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form?

Solving for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form is important in many scientific fields, such as physics, chemistry, and engineering. It allows us to model and analyze real-life situations by finding the relationship between two variables and predicting their values.

4. Are there any limitations when solving for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form?

Yes, there are limitations when solving for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form. The method may not work if the equations are not in standard form or if the equations are dependent or inconsistent. In addition, it may be difficult to solve if the equations involve complex numbers.

5. Can you use the method of solving for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form for systems with more than 2 equations?

Yes, the method of solving for 2 unknowns and 2 equations in rectangular form can be extended to systems with more than 2 equations. It involves using the same techniques of substitution or elimination, but with more variables and equations. This method is known as the Gaussian elimination method.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
251
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
35
Views
3K
Back
Top