Solving for Constants in Simple Harmonic Motion Lab - Tips and Troubleshooting

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the constants B, n, and p in the equation T=B*k^n*m^p for simple harmonic motion. The user, Dan, has already derived two power regression equations: y = 1.2787x^0.4742 for period vs. mass and y = 0.6854x^-0.4939 for period vs. spring constant. While Dan successfully identified n and p, he struggles to calculate B, which should approximate 2π. A suggestion is made to derive B from the slope of the log plot of the first graph, where k is held constant.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion principles
  • Familiarity with power regression analysis
  • Knowledge of logarithmic plotting techniques
  • Basic skills in mathematical modeling
NEXT STEPS
  • Research how to derive constants from regression slopes
  • Learn about Lissajous figures and their relevance in harmonic motion
  • Explore advanced techniques for fitting models to experimental data
  • Study the relationship between spring constants and mass in oscillatory systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, researchers in mechanics, and anyone involved in experimental physics or mathematical modeling of oscillatory systems.

dm208
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I have completed a lab for simple harmonic motion, with the goal of finding the constants B, n, and p in the equation T=B*k^n*m^p, where k is the spring constant and m is the mass.

I suppose this is more of a math question, because I already have two separate power regressions: one is y = 1.2787x^0.4742 (period [y] vs. mass [x]) and the other is y = 0.6854x^-0.4939 (period [y] vs. spring constant [x]).

I know that I now have n and p (which are both close to the actual values), but I'm having trouble finding B. I tried setting the above equations equal (to find the intersection), and substituting the x-value into T, the y-value into both k and m, and the powers above into n and p. Obviously something is very incorrect because I get nowhere near 2pi for B.

Any advice would be appreciated. Thanks in advance!
Dan.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
From your rather inadequate description I suggest you can get a value of B from the slope of both graphs. In the first graph you have held the value of k constant, so the slope ( of the log plot ) is B*k^n.

Are you making Lissajous figures ?
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
996