Solving for g|(-1): Finding the Answer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dell
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the derivative of the function g(x) defined as g(x) = f(x²), specifically evaluating g'(-1) given that f'(1) = 4. Participants explore the implications of the squared function and its derivative.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between g(-1) and g(1) due to the nature of g as a squared function. There is an attempt to express g'(-1) in terms of f' and explore the implications of the known derivative f'(1).

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the derivative notation and confirmed the reasoning presented. There is a question raised about the approach if the specific value of 1 were not provided, indicating an exploration of alternative methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants are operating under the assumption that they have sufficient information to evaluate g'(-1) based on the given derivative f'(1). There is an implicit constraint regarding the use of specific values in the evaluation process.

Dell
Messages
555
Reaction score
0
any ideas??

given:
y=f(x)
f|(1)=4
g(x)=f(x2)

find g|(-1)
------------------------------------

i know that g(-1)=g(1) because g is a squared function of x, but that's about it,
can i say-

g|(x)=[f(x2)]|=f|(x2)*(2x)

and because x=-1, and -12=1, and i know f|(1)=4
so
g|(-1)=-8
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Dell said:
given:
y=f(x)
f|(1)=4
g(x)=f(x2)

find g|(-1)
------------------------------------

i know that g(-1)=g(1) because g is a squared function of x, but that's about it,
can i say-

g|(x)=[f(x2)]|=f|(x2)*(2x)

and because x=-1, and -12=1, and i know f|(1)=4
so
g|(-1)=-8


Yes, this is exactly right. Good job.
 


Yes, that's exactly right. Although you would be better advised to use ', a single apostrophe to indicate the derivative rather than |.
 


thanks, is there any way i would be able to solve it if i weren't given 1 as my x?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K