Solving for Index of Refraction Using x, d, and θ

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves finding the index of refraction (n) of a rectangle using variables x, d, and θ, with a focus on applying Snell's law, which relates the angles of incidence and refraction to the indices of refraction of the two media.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the possibility of solving for θ2 in terms of x, d, and θ1, with some expressing uncertainty about the complexity of the resulting equations. Others suggest using Snell's law to derive relationships among the variables and question how to isolate sin(θ2) from the equations presented.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different mathematical approaches and questioning the assumptions made about the angles involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of trigonometric identities and the implications of assuming small angles, though there is no consensus on the best method to proceed.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential assumptions regarding the size of θ, but it is noted that accurate measurements of θ1 and d are necessary for solving the problem, indicating that small angle approximations may not apply.

CINA
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the index of refraction n of the rectangle using x, d, and θ.

http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/6079/snellslaw.jpg

Homework Equations



n1*sin(θ1)=n2*sin(θ2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Is it possible to solve this problem given the relevant data? What I did was try to find θ2 in terms of x, d, and θ (now called θ1). What I came up with was:

cos(\theta_{2})=\frac{x*sin(\theta_{1}-\theta_{2})}{d}

From the two right triangles that can be constructed:

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/6606/snellslaw2.jpg

But either this isn't right or I don't see a simple way to proceed from here. I used wolfram to solve the above equation for θ2, but the result seems too complicated to be the answer. Can someone help, anyone with a simpler approach? Perhaps n1*sin(θ1)=n2*sin(θ2) is useless in this case?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You do have to use Snell's law to get the relation among x, d, and θ1. Expand sin(θ1-θ2). Find sin(θ2). Write both sin(θ2) and cos(θ2) in terms of sin(θ1). Use them in the expression for d.

ehild
 
Last edited:
What do you mean "Find sin(θ2)." Do you mean isolate it from sin(θ1-θ2)=sin(θ1)*cos(θ2)-cos(θ1)*sin(θ2)=d/a ?
 
CINA said:
What do you mean "Find sin(θ2)." Do you mean isolate it from sin(θ1-θ2)=sin(θ1)*cos(θ2)-cos(θ1)*sin(θ2)=d/a ?

Find sin(θ2) from Snells law in terms of sin(θ1) and the refractive index of the slab relative to the surrounding medium.

ehild
 
Last edited:
Ok, so here are the equations I'm using:
(1)n_{1}sin(\theta_{1})=n_{2}sin(\theta_{2})

(2)cos(\theta_{2})=\frac{x}{a}

(3)sin(\theta_{1}-\theta_{2})=\frac{d}{a}I find sin(\theta_{2}) from (1):

\frac{n_{1}}{n_{2}}sin(\theta_{1})=sin(\theta_{2})

I expand (2):

sin(\theta_{1})cos(\theta_{2})-cos(\theta_{1})sin(\theta_{2})=\frac{d}{a}

Plug (1) and (3) into (2):

sin(\theta_{1})\frac{x}{a}-cos(\theta_{1})\frac{n_{1}}{n_{2}}sin(\theta_{1})=\frac{d}{a}

But..."a" is an unknown, I can't solve for n2 until a is eliminated. Am I doing something wrong?
(n1 is assumed to be 1)
 
Last edited:
Hello CINA,

Just out of curiosity, is there anything left out of the problem statement such as θ being small (perhaps less than π/18 [which corresponds to around 10o)?

If so, approximations exist that would make solving for an approximate answer much easier.

For small θ (where θ is expressed in radians),
sinθθ
cosθ ≈ 1​

I'm not sure if assuming a small θ applies to this particular problem though.
 
CINA said:
But..."a" is an unknown, I can't solve for n2 until a is eliminated. Am I doing something wrong?
(n1 is assumed to be 1)

cos(θ2)=x/a . Write a in terms of x and cos(θ2) and use cos(θ2)=√(1-sin2(θ2))

ehild
 
collinsmark said:
Hello CINA,

Just out of curiosity, is there anything left out of the problem statement such as θ being small (perhaps less than π/18 [which corresponds to around 10o)?

Hello, Collinsmark,

There is no indication in the problem that θ1 is small. As the refractive index of the slab is to be obtained, θ1 and d has to be accurately measured, so they can not be two small. The problem can be solved without assuming small angle of incidence.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K