Solving for \pi_{H} and \pi_{L} in Limit Case

  • Thread starter Thread starter kayhm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algebra
kayhm
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Is there a way to solve for \pi_{H} and \pi_{L} which are probabilities when:

\pi_{H} N_{H} + \pi_{L} N_{L} = 1
(1 - \pi_{H})^{M-1} y_{H} = k
(1 - \pi_{L})^{M-1} y_{L} = k

It s ok to solve it for the limit case as N_{H}, N_{L}, and M go to infinity.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
leave alone solving it , i do not even understand the symbols in the question

can anyone explain to me what they are?
 
His notation is godawful but I think he wants to solve

AN^H + BN^L = 1
(1-A)^(M-1)Y^H = k
(1-B)^(M-1)Y^L = k

for A and B. And he's writing pi_h for A and pi_L for B

In this case the solution is obvious:
A =1 - (kY^-H)^1/(M-1)
B =1 - (kY^-L)^1/(M-1)
And the first equation must still be true meaning there is some kind of constraint on k, Y, H, M and L, and N whatever the heck those are.
 
Given two equations don't look too hard to solve, so why not give it a try?
 
Sorry. i fixed the notations to an easier to see format.

kayhm said:
Is there a way to solve for A and B which are probabilities when:

AN + BL = 1
(1 - A)^(M-1) x = k
(1 - B)^(M-1) y = k

It s ok to solve it for the limit case as N, L, and M go to infinity.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top