Solving for Real Current in a Complex Circuit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the real current in a complex circuit, specifically how to express the complex current in terms of its real amplitude and phase. The original poster presents a complex expression for the current and seeks guidance on converting it to a real-valued function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss methods for rewriting the complex current expression, including the use of complex conjugates and the extraction of amplitude and phase. There are questions about the correct form of the expression and the implications of phase shifts.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with each other's suggestions, exploring different interpretations of the mathematical steps involved. Some guidance has been offered regarding the manipulation of complex numbers, but there is no explicit consensus on the final approach.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific circuit parameters and initial conditions that may influence the complexity of the resulting expressions for current. Participants also express concerns about the length and complexity of the expressions derived from their calculations.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi all.

Please take a look at the attachted circuit.

I have found the following expression for the complex current in the resistor (the hat indicates that it is complex):

<br /> \widehat_{I (t)} = \frac{{\omega ^2 LC {\widehat{U_0} }}}{{\omega ^2 LRC + i\omega L - R}}\exp ( - i\omega t),<br />
where U_0 is the amplitude of U(t), and the hat indicates that it is complex.

Now I wish to find the real current, and I want to write it as:
<br /> I(t) = I_0\cos(\omega t + \phi).<br />

But how do I do this? I have spent like 2 hours trying, but I don't know how to rewrite the complex amplitude of the current to have a phase.

Thanks in advance.

Regards
Niles.
 

Attachments

  • circuit.png
    circuit.png
    636 bytes · Views: 388
Physics news on Phys.org
Niles said:
I have found the following expression for the complex current in the resistor (the hat indicates that it is complex):

<br /> \widehat_{I (t)} = \frac{{\omega ^2 LC {\widehat{U_0} }}}{{\omega ^2 LRC + i\omega L - R}}\exp ( - i\omega t),<br />
where U_0 is the amplitude of U(t), and the hat indicates that it is complex.

Now I wish to find the real current, and I want to write it as:
<br /> I(t) = I_0\cos(\omega t + \phi).<br />

Hi Niles! :smile:

(have an omega: ω and a phi: φ :wink:)

The standard way would be to write the left bit as A + iB (multiply top-and-bottom by the complex conjugate of the bottom), and then

Re(A + iB)eiωt = Re(A + iB)(cosωt + isinωt)

= Acosωt - Bsinωt,

which maybe you know how to rewrite as Ccos(ωt + φ) ? :wink:
 
Ok, so you are telling me to multiply the first term on the RHS with the complex conjugate and then take the square root. Thus I get the amplitude of the current, and now we have to multiply that with exp(iφ).

But this gives me: ... * exp(-i(ωt-φ))? Don't we want a plus instead?

And thanks for replying!
 
Niles said:
Ok, so you are telling me to multiply the first term on the RHS with the complex conjugate and then take the square root. Thus I get the amplitude of the current, and now we have to multiply that with exp(iφ).

But this gives me: ... * exp(-i(ωt-φ))? Don't we want a plus instead?

Why are you taking the square root? :confused:

(And you did multiply top and bottom, didn't you? To get a complex over a real?)

Anyway, you don't multiply the amplitude with exp(iφ) …

you can't find the amplitude (or the phase) until you've got the whole function …

in other words, until after you multiply. :smile:
 
Ok, so what I do is:

1) Multiply the first term on the RHS with the complex conjugate of the denominator.

2) I find the phase, and write the first term as: z = |z|*exp(iφ).

3) Find the real part, and all ...

4) Done? If yes, then I will go to bed.

EDIT: Can you confirm me in that -0.1 * 2*Pi radians is equal to 2*Pi - 0.1 * 2*Pi radians?
 
I'm not convinced that you've got it.

You're given (K + iL)/(M + iN) times eiωt

that's (K + iL)(M - iN)/(M + iN)(M - iN) times eiωt

= (K + iL)(M - iN)/(M2 + N2) times eiωt

the bottom is real, so the whole of the left can now easily be put in the form A + iB …

go on from there.
Niles said:
Can you confirm me in that -0.1 * 2*Pi radians is equal to 2*Pi - 0.1 * 2*Pi radians?

Yes, adding multiples of 2π to the phase makes no difference … e2πi = 1

… so if your result comes out as more than 2π, just subtract 2π (or 4π or … ) :smile:
 
tiny-tim said:
I'm not convinced that you've got it.

You're given (K + iL)/(M + iN) times eiωt

that's (K + iL)(M - iN)/(M + iN)(M - iN) times eiωt

= (K + iL)(M - iN)/(M2 + N2) times eiωt

the bottom is real, so the whole of the left can now easily be put in the form A + iB …

go on from there.

And then I write z = A + iB as z = |z|e, right?
 
sorry!

Niles said:
And then I write z = A + iB as z = |z|e, right?

ooh, I misunderstood what you wrote earlier …

even though it was clear :rolleyes:
Niles said:
I find the phase, and write the first term as: z = |z|*exp(iφ).

Yes, that's right … then the real current will be the real part of |z|*exp(-iωt + iφ), = |z|*cos(-ωt + φ)

To answer a previous point, cos(x) = cos(-x), so the minus sign doesn't matter (though it will mess up the sign of φ). :smile:

Ignore some of my previous comments. :redface:
 


tiny-tim said:
Ignore some of my previous comments. :redface:

Nono, they were all good. Thanks for helping me - I see it much clearer now!


Niles.
 
  • #10
I have found the phase φ to be -0.63, which is equivalent of 5.65. Does this mean that I am allowed to write:

I(t) = Re [|z|*exp(-iωt - 0.63i)] = Re [|z|*exp(-i(ωt + 0.63)] = |z|*cos(ωt + 0.63),

where Re [..] denotes the real part of the argument "...".
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Niles said:
I have found the phase φ to be -0.63, which is equivalent of 5.65. Does this mean that I am allowed to write:

I(t) = Re [|z|*exp(-iωt - 0.63i)] = Re [|z|*exp(-i(ωt + 0.63)] = |z|*cos(ωt + 0.63),

where Re [..] denotes the real part of the argument "...".

Yup! :biggrin:
 
  • #12
Great! Thanks!

Just one last thing: Is it correct that sometimes the expressions for the current are very nasty? I mean, they are sometimes quite long :rolleyes:
 
  • #13
Niles said:
Great! Thanks!

Just one last thing: Is it correct that sometimes the expressions for the current are very nasty? I mean, they are sometimes quite long :rolleyes:

oooh … dunno! :redface:

i never did current 'n' stuff …

i just know about the maths bit! :smile:
 
  • #14
Ahh, I see.

But thanks anyway!
 
  • #15
Niles said:
Great! Thanks!

Just one last thing: Is it correct that sometimes the expressions for the current are very nasty? I mean, they are sometimes quite long :rolleyes:

Hah, yes.

Consider a serial RCL circuit, that is, a voltage source connected to a condensator, a loop and a resistor. Let's say the Resistor is 200 ohm, the loop is 1 millihenry and the condensator is 20 nanofahrad. If you apply a simple voltage, not even timevariable, of 10 volt to this system, the current will look like this:

i(t)=0.05*e^(-100000*t)*sin(200000*t)

(this assumes i(0)=0 and i'(0)=10000)

If, instead, you apply an AC source, the voltage function (again assuming i(0)=0 but i'(0)=2*10^9) of which being v(t)=10*sin(20000*t), the resulting current function looks like this:

i(t) = (1/20)*e^(-100000*t)*sin(200000*t)+B*sin(200000*t)+A*cos(200000*t).


Explaining why this is so takes about two full pages.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #16
Nissen said:
i(t) = (1/20)*e^(-100000*t)*sin(200000*t)+B*sin(200000*t)+A*cos(200000*t).

Oh, I forgot to substitute the variables. A=1/85 and B=4/85
 
  • #17
I am familiar with Kirchhoff's laws (I guess that's what you are referring to?), and I used them to find my expression.

But I guess I should stop fearing long expressions :smile:
 
  • #18
Niles said:
I am familiar with Kirchhoff's laws (I guess that's what you are referring to?), and I used them to find my expression.

But I guess I should stop fearing long expressions :smile:

Nah, it's

L*i''(t)+R*i'(t)+1/C*i=V'(0)

where

L=1 milliHenry, R=200 ohm and C=20 nanofahrad.
Applying 10 volt (DC) to this system gets you

0.001*i'' + 200*i' + 5*10^7*i = 0.

Solving this equation:

0.001*y^2 + 200*y + 50000000 = 0

gives you two imaginary numbers,

y1=100000 + j*200000
y2=100000 - j*200000

which means that

i(t) = e^(-100000*t)*( A*sin(200000*t) + B*cos(200000*t) ).

(This is the general solution to the "ordinary differential equation" shown above.)

To find A and B, you need to know some starting conditions. We know i(0)=0 because the loop has "infinite resistance*" when you apply the initial potential.

Knowing that i(0)=0 means you can rewrite, so:

i(t) = e^(-100000*t)*( A*sin(200000*t) + B*cos(200000*t) )
=>
i(0) = e^(0)*(A*sin(0) + B*cos(0))
=>
0 = A*sin(0)+B*cos(0)
=>
0 = B*1
=>
B=0

so you can simplify the initial expression for the current to

i(t) = e^(-100000*t)*A*sin(200000*t)

from elsewhere (and I honestly can't remember) we know that i'(0)=10000, so A can be isolated and determined. I don't want to write out di/dt here because it is a damn long function, but suffice to say, it turns out A = 0.05 so

i(t) = 0.05*sin(200000*t)*e^(-100000*t)

All in all, current determination becomes complicated once you have a lot of loops and capacitors, but not so difficult that you should feel discouraged - there are a lot of shortcuts and neat tools at your disposal if you ever start in on the subject in a serious manner.

*not true
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
951
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K