MHB Solving for Real Numbers $a$ and $b$ in $f(x)=\dfrac{1}{ax+b}$

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding real numbers \( a \) and \( b \) for the function \( f(x) = \frac{1}{ax+b} \) such that there are three distinct real numbers \( x_1, x_2, x_3 \) satisfying \( f(x_1) = x_2 \), \( f(x_2) = x_3 \), and \( f(x_3) = x_1 \). A key insight is that the condition \( a + b^2 = 0 \) is necessary for the existence of such distinct solutions. The participants also derived a quadratic equation from the function's properties and discussed the implications of its discriminant for ensuring distinct solutions. Graphical analysis was suggested to visualize the conditions under which the function behaves as required. The conclusion emphasizes the importance of the derived condition for solving the problem effectively.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Hi MHB,


This problem has given me a very hard time because I have exhausted all the methods that I know to figure out a way to find for the values for both a and b but no, there must be a trick to this problem and I admit that it is a question that is out of my reach...

Could you show me how to attack this problem, please?

Thanks in advance.:)

Problem:

For real numbers $a$ and $b$ define $f(x)=\dfrac{1}{ax+b}$. For which $a$ and $b$ are there three distinct real numbers $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $f(x_1)=x_2$, $f(x_2)=x_3$ and $f(x_3)=x_1$?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Hi MHB,


This problem has given me a very hard time because I have exhausted all the methods that I know to figure out a way to find for the values for both a and b but no, there must be a trick to this problem and I admit that it is a question that is out of my reach...

Could you show me how to attack this problem, please?

Thanks in advance.:)

Problem:

For real numbers $a$ and $b$ define $f(x)=\dfrac{1}{ax+b}$. For which $a$ and $b$ are there three distinct real numbers $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $f(x_1)=x_2$, $f(x_2)=x_3$ and $f(x_3)=x_1$?


some one may come with a neat method but one solution I suggest is

f(f(f(x) = x

now f(f(1/(ax+b)) = x
 
anemone said:
Hi MHB,


This problem has given me a very hard time because I have exhausted all the methods that I know to figure out a way to find for the values for both a and b but no, there must be a trick to this problem and I admit that it is a question that is out of my reach...

Could you show me how to attack this problem, please?

Thanks in advance.:)

Problem:

For real numbers $a$ and $b$ define $f(x)=\dfrac{1}{ax+b}$. For which $a$ and $b$ are there three distinct real numbers $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $f(x_1)=x_2$, $f(x_2)=x_3$ and $f(x_3)=x_1$?


With trivial substitions You should arrive to the second order equation...

$\displaystyle a\ (a+b)\ x_{1}^{2} + (a + 2\ b - a\ b)\ x_{1} + b - 1 =0\ (1)$

... and the condition for real solution of Your system is to be $\ge 0$ the discriminant of (1)... if the solutions are also 'distinct' is of course a different problem...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
anemone said:
For real numbers $a$ and $b$ define $f(x)=\dfrac{1}{ax+b}$. For which $a$ and $b$ are there three distinct real numbers $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $f(x_1)=x_2$, $f(x_2)=x_3$ and $f(x_3)=x_1$?
I prefer to call the numbers $x,\ y,\ z$, so that $f(x)=y$, $f(y) = z$ and $f(z)= x$. Then $y = \dfrac1{ax+b}$, $$z = \frac1{\frac a{ax+b} + b} = \frac{ax+b}{abx+b+b^2},$$ $$ x = \frac1{\frac{a^2x+ab}{abx+b+b^2} + b} = \frac{abx+b+b^2}{(a^2+ab^2)x + 2ab + b^2}.$$ Therefore $$(a^2+ab^2)x^2 + (2ab + b^2)x = abx+b+b^2$$, which simplifies to $a(a+b^2)x^2 + b(a+b^2)x - (a+b^2) = 0.$ Divide through by $a+b^2$ to get $ax^2+bx-1 = 0.$ But now we are in trouble, because if $ax^2+bx-1 = 0$ then (dividing through by $x$) $\frac1x = ax+b$, which means that $x = \frac1{ax+b} = y$, contradicting the requirement that $x$ and $y$ should be distinct.

Looking back to see what went wrong, you notice (if you did not do so at the time) that we divided that quadratic equation by the constant $a+b^2$ without considering the possibility that $a+b^2=0$. That is the only thing that can rescue the problem from having no solution, so it looks as though the answer to the question is that $a$ and $b$ must satisfy the condition $a+b^2=0$. That is certainly a necessary condition, and I leave it to you to check that it is also sufficient for the problem to have a solution.
 
chisigma said:
With trivial substitions You should arrive to the second order equation...

$\displaystyle a\ (a+b)\ x_{1}^{2} + (a + 2\ b - a\ b)\ x_{1} + b - 1 =0\ (1)$

... and the condition for real solution of Your system is to be $\ge 0$ the discriminant of (1)... if the solutions are also 'distinct' is of course a different problem...

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

kaliprasad said:
some one may come with a neat method but one solution I suggest is

f(f(f(x) = x

now f(f(1/(ax+b)) = x

Thank you to both of you, kaliprasad and chisigma for the help!

Opalg said:
I prefer to call the numbers $x,\ y,\ z$, so that $f(x)=y$, $f(y) = z$ and $f(z)= x$. Then $y = \dfrac1{ax+b}$, $$z = \frac1{\frac a{ax+b} + b} = \frac{ax+b}{abx+b+b^2},$$ $$ x = \frac1{\frac{a^2x+ab}{abx+b+b^2} + b} = \frac{abx+b+b^2}{(a^2+ab^2)x + 2ab + b^2}.$$ Therefore $$(a^2+ab^2)x^2 + (2ab + b^2)x = abx+b+b^2$$, which simplifies to $a(a+b^2)x^2 + b(a+b^2)x - (a+b^2) = 0.$ Divide through by $a+b^2$ to get $ax^2+bx-1 = 0.$ But now we are in trouble, because if $ax^2+bx-1 = 0$ then (dividing through by $x$) $\frac1x = ax+b$, which means that $x = \frac1{ax+b} = y$, contradicting the requirement that $x$ and $y$ should be distinct.

Looking back to see what went wrong, you notice (if you did not do so at the time) that we divided that quadratic equation by the constant $a+b^2$ without considering the possibility that $a+b^2=0$. That is the only thing that can rescue the problem from having no solution, so it looks as though the answer to the question is that $a$ and $b$ must satisfy the condition $a+b^2=0$. That is certainly a necessary condition, and I leave it to you to check that it is also sufficient for the problem to have a solution.

Good answer, with an excellent explanation! Mr. Opalg, I can't tell you how thankful that I am for all your help!

I realized now that for any given equation, in order to keep it balance, not only we can add/subtract the same quantity from both sides of the equation, we can also take square root to it, square it, divide the whole equation by some quantity which isn't zero (such as the situation in this instance), I am so happy that I learned something so valuable today! Thank you so so much, Opalg!
 
Opalg said:
That is the only thing that can rescue the problem from having no solution, so it looks as though the answer to the question is that $a$ and $b$ must satisfy the condition $a+b^2=0$. That is certainly a necessary condition, and I leave it to you to check that it is also sufficient for the problem to have a solution.

Btw,:) I used the graph of the function $f(x)=\dfrac{1}{ax+b}=\dfrac{1}{-b^2x+b}$ below to check that the condition $a+b^2=0$ suggests that there are three distinct real numbers $x_1, x_2, x_3$ such that $f(x_1)=x_2$, $f(x_2)=x_3$ and $f(x_3)=x_1$:

View attachment 1467
 

Attachments

  • Verification.JPG
    Verification.JPG
    30.4 KB · Views: 107
Last edited:
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top