Solving for y(t): The Mystery Revealed

  • Thread starter Thread starter Larsson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mystery
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a differential equation involving the Dirac delta function and its implications for the function y(t). Participants explore the transformation of the equation and the application of Laplace transforms in their attempts to find y(t).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the interpretation of the Dirac delta function and its application in the context of the differential equation. There are attempts to rewrite the equation and apply Laplace transforms, with some questioning the initial conditions and the resulting expressions for y(t).

Discussion Status

Several participants have offered insights and alternative approaches, but there is no explicit consensus on the solution. The conversation includes various interpretations and methods, indicating an ongoing exploration of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of initial conditions and the behavior of the function as t approaches zero, which remain under discussion without resolution. Some participants express uncertainty about their approaches and the definitions involved.

Larsson
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
(t*y'(t))' = t*Dirac(t-2), t>0
we know that y(t) = 1 lim t--> o+
solve for y(t)

the solution says that by using
f(t)*Dirac_a(t) = f(a) * Dirac_a(t) we get

(t*y'(t))' = 2*Dirac(t-2) Dont see how they get that
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, by "Dirac" you mean the Dirac delta function, not the Dirac operator.

Yes, the second equation is applied to the first to convert the "t" to the value "2". Another way of putting this.

Since Dirac(t-2) is zero except when t=2, you might as well go replace t with 2 everywhere that is multplied by Dirac(t-2).

Hope this helps.

Carl
 
You know Larsson, I'd like to know what the solution is to this problem. Me, I'd rewrite it as:

[tex]ty^{''}+y^{'}=t\delta_2(t)[/tex]

Taking the Laplace transform of both sides results in:

[tex]-sY-s^2Y^{'}=2e^{-2s}[/tex]

Solving for Y I get:

[tex]Y(s)=-\frac{2}{s}\text{Ei}(-2s)+\frac{c}{s}[/tex]

where Ei[x] is the exponential integral function.

Inverting I get:

[tex]y(t)=2\text{ln}(t/2)\text{UnitStep}(t-2)+c[/tex]

You said the limit of y(t) as t goes to zero is 1 so I'd let c=1. However, I'm not very confident of this as the question of initial conditions for both the DE in t and the DE in s is not well defined in my mind. What is your solution?
 
Almost correct. + A*ln(t) and you're right


While we're at it I have another:

find a function y which you can apply to

y'(t) - int(2*sin(t - tau) * y(tau) d tau tau = 0 .. t) = cos(t) y(0) = -1/2

Bt using the definition of convolution I get that it can be written

y'(t) - 2 sin(t)* y(t) = cos(t)

laplacetransformation gives

sY +1/2 - 2/(s^2+1) * Y = s/(s^2+1)

Y (s - 2/(s^2+1)) = s/(s^2+1) - 1/2

Y ( s(s^2+1) - 2) = s - (s^2 + 1)/2

Y = s/(s(s^2+1) - 2) - (s^2 + 1)/(2*(s^2 + 1))

and from here everything just crashes, don't get anything that makes sence
 
Larsson said:
Almost correct. + A*ln(t) and you're right

Thanks, I'll spend more time with it as I think it's an interesting problem.

While we're at it I have another:
find a function y which you can apply to
y'(t) - int(2*sin(t - tau) * y(tau) d tau tau = 0 .. t) = cos(t) y(0) = -1/2

Looks like:

[tex]y^{'}-2\int_0^t Sin[t-\tau]y(\tau)d\tau=Cos[t],\quad y(0)=1/2[/tex]

That too is very interesting. I'll work with it too.:smile:
 
Larsson said:
y'(t) - 2 sin(t)* y(t) = cos(t)

An obvious solution to the homogeneous problem is

[tex]y(t) = c \; e^{-2\cos(t)}[/tex]

One of my old physics professors would say that a solution to the inhomogeneous problem can be obtained by a "simple quadrature".

Carl
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K