Solving Friction & Heat Generated: Analytical Modeling

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter alpha754293
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Friction Modelling
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around analytical modeling of friction and the heat generated due to friction (Qfric) in sliding and rotating contacts. Participants explore various models and approaches to calculate frictional forces and the resulting heat, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting with a sliding contact model, using rectangles or cylinders to analyze friction and heat generation.
  • Another participant proposes calculating heat from work done, using the formula force times distance, where the force is derived from the coefficient of friction and normal force.
  • A different viewpoint emphasizes integrating surface frictional shear stress over the contact area to determine frictional work and its relation to heat.
  • One participant introduces a model for frictional energy dissipation, expressing it in terms of shear stress and slip rate, and discusses how to quantify the heat generated from this dissipation.
  • Another participant mentions that energy lost to friction can be calculated as the product of normal force, coefficient of friction, and distance, while noting that some energy may be converted to sound and electromagnetic waves.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants present multiple competing views and approaches to modeling friction and heat generation, with no consensus reached on a single method or solution.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty regarding the coefficients and parameters needed for their models, such as the coefficient of friction and the specifics of energy dissipation. The discussion also highlights the complexity introduced by different geometries and conditions of contact.

alpha754293
Messages
29
Reaction score
1
What is the best way to solve for friction, and in particular, heat generated due to friction (Qfric), analytically?

The first presumption is that is a sliding contact (the domain can be either 2D or 3D, it doesn't really matter yet at this point).

One model is to have two rectangles sliding along each other, and to be able to test for feasibility for calculating friction.

The other is two cylinders (or circles) rotating in same and opposite directions, but at different angular velocities.

I haven't been able to find the correlation or a way to calculate Qfric easily or readily.

Based on physics, force due to friction = coeff. of friction * normal force.

Ff = uN

Based on thermodynamics, heat (transferred) = specific heat capacity at constant pressure (Cp) * (T_high - T_low).

Q = Cp * delta(T)

Any ideas or suggestions?

I have access to the following tools to help me try and solve (and eventually simulate) this piece of the problem:

MATLAB
COMSOL
Ansys CFX
Ansys Mechanical

Other things that might be important to note: I don't have experimental data that I am trying to simulate (yet) therefore; the materials are arbitrarily selected as steel (for both surfaces). I don't know the coefficient of friction (yet) but I can probably look that up.

The surfaces do not have any type of lubricating material (i.e. dry surface on dry surface) because analytically, the introduction of any fluid (I think) makes it harder to solve.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The easiest way to figure out the heat is from the work done -- force X distance. The force is the mu*N friction force, and the distance depends on the geometry, etc.
 
berkeman said:
The easiest way to figure out the heat is from the work done -- force X distance. The force is the mu*N friction force, and the distance depends on the geometry, etc.

But see, the only way that I (currently) know how to solve for work from a thermo/fluids standpoint, is the integral of pressure with respect to change in volume.

In a 2D case, there is no dV.

And that the only way that I can think of relating it back to thermo with regards to heat is by the first law of thermodynamics:

q - w = (change in enthalpy) + (change in kinetic energy) + (change in potential energy)
 
I may be missing something, but how about building it around integrating the surface frictional shear stress & the related relative slip path (pretty much like above but the way many contact modeling software work on it) over the domain of interest/the whole contact surface?
 
PerennialII said:
I may be missing something, but how about building it around integrating the surface frictional shear stress & the related relative slip path (pretty much like above but the way many contact modeling software work on it) over the domain of interest/the whole contact surface?

So, would that be:

closed surface integral (friction shear stress) dA

where ds is the relative slip path f(x,y)? (which translates to dx dy)

So, would that give me friction force, or frictional work? And how would I relate that back to heat?

Q - W = 0 change in enthalpy + 0 change in KE + 0 change in PE?
 
I was thinking of expressing the rate of frictional energy dissipation as

<br /> P_{friction}= \tau \cdot \dot{\gamma}<br />

(shear stress * slip rate)

And the amount of energy released on a surface under contact would then be

<br /> q=\eta f P_{friction}<br />

where f would specify how much of the heat goes to either side of the contact (0.5 if nothing else known) and \eta is a factor specifying how much of the dissipated energy turns out as heat (so 1 if nothing else known).

It's essentially a typical gap heat generation model which is used for example when solving related coupled problems numerically.
 
PerennialII said:
I was thinking of expressing the rate of frictional energy dissipation as

<br /> P_{friction}= \tau \cdot \dot{\gamma}<br />

(shear stress * slip rate)

And the amount of energy released on a surface under contact would then be

<br /> q=\eta f P_{friction}<br />

where f would specify how much of the heat goes to either side of the contact (0.5 if nothing else known) and \eta is a factor specifying how much of the dissipated energy turns out as heat (so 1 if nothing else known).

It's essentially a typical gap heat generation model which is used for example when solving related coupled problems numerically.

Hmm...that's very interesting. I've never seen that equation before. I will have to sit and ponder on it for a bit. Thank you!
 
You could calculate the energy that is lost to friction. This is simply E_{friction} = N\mu \Delta x. This is essentially what berkeman was saying. Some portion of this energy is transferred into sound and EM waves, although I don't know how significant this portion is. If your not in a vacuum, then some of the heat would be transferred to air.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
9K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K