Solving FT of Decaying Exp: Lorentzian Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amok
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating an integral involving an exponential decay function and its relation to the Lorentzian function. The integral in question is presented with a focus on the behavior of complex exponentials and limits as they approach infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the evaluation of the integral using different approaches, including direct integration and the use of Euler's formula. Questions arise regarding the validity of splitting limits and the convergence of complex exponentials.

Discussion Status

Some participants provide guidance on the limits involved in the integral, while others question the assumptions made about the convergence of the limits. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of using modulus in calculations and the conditions under which limits exist.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the behavior of complex functions and their limits, with references to the modulus of complex numbers and its implications for convergence. There is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in proving the behavior of these limits.

Amok
Messages
254
Reaction score
1
I had to show that:

[tex]\int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-a \left | t \right |} e^{\omega t} \mathrm{d} t[/tex]

with a positive, is equal to a Lorentzian function.

I simply did this:

[tex] <br /> \int_{-\infty}^{\infty} e^{-a \left | t \right |} e^{i\omega t} \mathrm{d} t = \int_{0}^{\infty} e^{(-a + i\omega) t} \mathrm{d} t + \int_{-\infty}^{0} e^{(a + i\omega)t } \mathrm{d} t<br /> = \frac{-1}{i\omega\ -a} + \frac{1}{i\omega + a} + \lim_{x \to -\infty} e^{(-a + i\omega )x} - \lim_{y \to +\infty} = \frac{2a}{\omega^2 + a^2} + \lim_{x \to +\infty} e^{-ax} lim_{x \to +\infty} e^{i\omega} - \lim_{y \to -\infty} e^{ax} \lim_{y \to -\infty} e^{i\omega} = \frac{2a}{\omega^2 + a^2}[/tex]

Is this correct? I'm asking because I've seen people do this by using Euler's formula and then calculating an integral with a cosine in it, but I don't really see the point of that.

EDIT: can you guys see the whole thing? I can't, what should I do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You're fine up to here:

[tex]\frac{-1}{i\omega\ -a} + \frac{1}{i\omega + a} + \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} - \lim_{t \to -\infty} e^{(a+i\omega)t}[/tex]

Then you just need to say the two limits are equal to 0.

What you can't do is split the limits up like you did:

[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} \Rightarrow \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{-at}\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{i\omega t}[/tex]

You can only say lim AB = (lim A)(lim B) if both lim A and lim B exist. In this case, the complex exponential oscillates and doesn't converge as t goes to infinity, so the limit doesn't exist.
 
Or, to add a little detail:

|e(-a+iω)t| = |e-at||eiωt| = |e-at| → 0 as t → ∞

and similarly for the other one.
 
vela said:
[tex]\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{(-a+i\omega)t} \Rightarrow \lim_{t \to \infty} e^{-at}\lim_{t \to \infty} e^{i\omega t}[/tex]

You can only say lim AB = (lim A)(lim B) if both lim A and lim B exist. In this case, the complex exponential oscillates and doesn't converge as t goes to infinity, so the limit doesn't exist.

That's what I thought, so how do I show that the limit does exist?
 
Do what LCKurtz did.
 
But how did he introduce the modulus in the calculations?
 
If |z| → 0 then doesn't that show z → 0?
 
Of course it does! Thank you guys.
 
LCKurtz said:
If |z| → 0 then doesn't that show z → 0?

I'm sorry to bring thus up again, but I can see that what you're saying is true, simply by picturing the polar form of a complex number on a complex plane, but how do you prove what you're saying? How can you really write it down?
 
  • #10
Doesn't z → 0 mean |z - 0| gets small?
 
  • #11
It mosta certainly does. The modulus of my function is

[tex]\left| e^{-at} \right|[/tex]

which does become arbitrarily small as t goes to infinity. I hadn't given much though to limits of complex functions for a while. This was good practice. Thank you very much Kurtz.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K