Solving functions for S in a q-q* Hamilton-Jacobi diffeq

  • Thread starter Thread starter dynamicskillingme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffeq Functions
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving functions for S in a Hamilton-Jacobi differential equation, particularly focusing on the implications of a non-time-dependent Lagrangian and the associated Hamiltonian. Participants are exploring the relationships between variables and constants of motion in the context of classical mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to formulate the Hamiltonian and separate variables in the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Questions arise regarding the dimensional consistency of terms and the implications of assuming certain variables are constants. There is also discussion about the correct setup of the Hamiltonian and the derivation of equations of motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on checking derivations and reasoning about the separation of variables. There is an ongoing exploration of how to proceed with the problem, with various interpretations of the equations being discussed. No explicit consensus has been reached, but productive lines of inquiry are being followed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential mistakes in their initial work and the need for simplification. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity of the problem and the necessity to clarify assumptions regarding the variables involved.

dynamicskillingme
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


68e84adeb694fd0f3b56217e4dc7352a.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have a solution for a) as
y%7D%20e%20B%20x%20-%20%5Cfrac%7B1%7D%7B2%7D%20m%20%28eBx%29%5E%7B2%7D%20-%20%28eBx%29%5E%7B2%7D.gif

For b) I formulate the equation as
20%28eBx%29%5E%7B2%7D%20+%20%28%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20S%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20t%7D%29%20%3D%200.gif

and so far for c) I have
gif.gif

My main idea at the moment is that as the Lagrangian was not time dependent, the Hamiltonian will not be. Following on maybe I can say that when separating variables T is constant so I can separate it so
gif.gif
but this is as far as I could get, as I couldn't think of how to separate them.

Any ideas, or are my problems due to a mistake in working?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dynamicskillingme said:

The Attempt at a Solution


So far I have a solution for a) as
gif.gif
The last three terms do not have the correct dimesions. I believe you have dropped some factors of ##2## and ##m##. So, check your derivation.

Alternately, you might see if you can first take the Lagrangian as given in terms of a general vector potential ##\bf{A}## and show that the Hamiltonian can be written nicely as ##H = \frac{1}{2m} (\mathbf{p}-e \mathbf{A}) \cdot (\mathbf{p}-e \mathbf{A})##. Then substitute the given expression for ##\mathbf{A}##.
and so far for c) I have
gif.gif
You probably didn't mean to have an equal sign after the ##T(t, \overline{x}, \overline{y})##

My main idea at the moment is that as the Lagrangian was not time dependent, the Hamiltonian will not be. Following on maybe I can say that when separating variables T is constant so I can separate it so
gif.gif
but this is as far as I could get, as I couldn't think of how to separate them.
You cannot conclude that ##T## is a constant. But you should be able to argue that ##\frac{\partial T}{\partial t}## is a constant.
Also, you should hope that ##X## and ##Y## are not identically equal to zero. If they were, there would be no hope of finding the correct equations for ##x(t)## and ##y(t)##.
 
Last edited:
My Hamilton was a mess from a mistake early on. After redoing it I get
7D%20-%203%20%28eBx%29%5E%7B2%7D%29%7D%7B2m%7D%20+%20%5Cfrac%7Bp_%7By%7D%28eBx%29%7D%7Bm%7D.gif
.

I can then formulate the hamiltonian jacobi again and get
03%28eBx%29%5E%7B2%7D%20%29%20+%20%5Cfrac%7B%5Cpartial%20S%7D%7B%5Cpartial%20t%7D%20%3D%200.gif


Then (and I'm mostly going from an example in my lecture notes and the question hints) I can separate the variables out as
gif.gif


That can be substituted as
gif.gif


In my notes the example only contains two separate variables e.g. X and T. He then makes every non time dependent term equal the time dependent terms and says they are both equal to a constant. He then solves X and T wrt this constant.

I'm not sure how to take this question further and solve for these functions.
 
dynamicskillingme said:
My Hamilton was a mess from a mistake early on. After redoing it I get
7D%20-%203%20%28eBx%29%5E%7B2%7D%29%7D%7B2m%7D%20+%20%5Cfrac%7Bp_%7By%7D%28eBx%29%7D%7Bm%7D.gif
.
The numerical factor of -3 is not correct for the ##(eBx)^2## term. Also, I believe the last term has the wrong sign.
Then (and I'm mostly going from an example in my lecture notes and the question hints) I can separate the variables out as
gif.gif
Yes
That can be substituted as
gif.gif


In my notes the example only contains two separate variables e.g. X and T. He then makes every non time dependent term equal the time dependent terms and says they are both equal to a constant. He then solves X and T wrt this constant.

I'm not sure how to take this question further and solve for these functions.

Here you want to use the usual type of reasoning when separating variables.
Suppose you have an equation of the form ##f(x) + g(y)## = 0 that must hold for all values of ##x## and ##y## within some domain. Here, ##f(x)## is a function only of ##x## and ##g(y)## is a function only of ##y##. Then you can argue that ##f(x)## must be a constant: ##f(x) = C## for all ##x##. Moreover, ##g(y)## must also be a constant which is the negative of ##C##; i.e., ##g(y) = -C##. Try to construct such an argument.

For your H-J equation, you have something of the form ##f(x,y) + \frac{dT(t)}{dt} = 0## that must hold for a range of values of ##x, y##, and ##t##. Use the type of argument mentioned above to deduce something about ##\frac{dT}{dt}##.
 
Okay, so I must have assumed something wrong early on or have made a pretty bad mistake in my work (not unheard of)
C%5C%20H%20%3D%20p_%7Bx%7D%20%5Cdot%7Bx%7D%20+%20p_%7By%7D%20%5Cdot%7By%7D%20-%20L%20%5C%5C.gif
 
dynamicskillingme said:
Okay, so I must have assumed something wrong early on or have made a pretty bad mistake in my work (not unheard of)
gif.gif
So far so good. Just a matter of simplifying.
 
The Hamiltonian is the Legendre transformation of the Lagrangian:
## H = \sum_{i} \dot q_i \frac {\partial L} {\partial \dot q_i} - L = m(\dot x^2 + \dot y^2) + eBx\dot y - \frac {m} {2}(\dot x^2 + \dot y^2)- eBx\dot y##
## = \frac {1} {2m} (p_x^2 + p_y^2)##
In this problem you need to find constants of motion. If you solve for the Lagrangian eqns. of motion, you will find:
## m\ddot x -eB\dot y = 0 →\frac {d} {dt}(m\dot x -eBy) = 0## and
## m\ddot y +eB\dot x = 0→\frac {d} {dt}(m\dot y +eBx) = 0##
Thus we have the constants of motion:
##\tilde p_x =(p_x -eBy) ##,
##\tilde p_y =(p_y +eBx)##.
We write the HJ equation with ## T(t,\tilde x,\tilde y) = \tilde xt## and substitute ## p_y = \tilde p_y - eBx## to get:
## (\frac {dX} {dx})^2 + ( \tilde p_y - eBx)^2 = 2m \tilde x##,
## X= \int dx\sqrt { 2m \tilde x- ( \tilde p_y - eBx)^2}##
## S= \int dx\sqrt { 2m \tilde x- ( \tilde p_y - eBx)^2} - \tilde xt##
##p_x = \frac {\partial S} {\partial x} = \sqrt { 2m \tilde x- ( \tilde p_y - eBx)^2} ##
##\tilde p_x = -\frac {\partial S} {\partial \tilde x} = -m \int dx\frac {1} { \sqrt { 2m \tilde x- ( \tilde p_y - eBx)^2}} +t##
We now make the substitution in the integral:
## x' =\tilde p_y - eBx ##,
## dx' = -eBdx ##
##\tilde p_x = -\frac {\partial S} {\partial \tilde x} = \frac {m} {eB} \int \frac {dx'} { \sqrt { 2m \tilde x- x'^2}} +t = \frac {m} {eB}sin^{-1}(\frac{\tilde p_y - eBx} { 2m \tilde x}) + t##
You can do the algebra to solve for x in terms of ##\tilde p_x ,\tilde p_y## and ##\tilde x##.
To get y just use the constant of motion equation ## y = \frac {m\dot x - \tilde p_x} {eB}##
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
989
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
56
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K