Solving GPE of Satellite in Circular Orbit

  • Thread starter Thread starter crafty2288
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gpe Satellite
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the gravitational potential energy (GPE) of a satellite in circular orbit and the conditions for escape velocity from Earth. Participants explore the relationships between kinetic energy and potential energy in the context of orbital mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to derive the relationship between kinetic energy and potential energy, questioning the algebraic steps involved. Some express confusion about the assumptions made in their calculations and the definitions of variables like velocity and radius.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided insights into the relationships between the energies involved and the equations governing orbital motion. There is ongoing exploration of how to derive escape velocity and the significance of gravitational acceleration in these equations. No explicit consensus has been reached, but productive dialogue continues.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the absence of specific numerical values for mass and radius, which complicates their calculations. The discussion also highlights the need to consider the effects of gravity near Earth's surface when discussing escape velocity.

crafty2288
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



i) Show that when a satellite (or planet) is in a circular orbit it's kinetic energy (positive) is one-half of it's potential energy (negative).

ii) Show that in order to escape from the Earth you need a speed v=sqrt(2gR) where g=9.8 m/s^2. Neglect Friction and effects of Earth's rotation.

Homework Equations



PE= -GMm/R
KE= (1/2)mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I feel like I'm doing some kind of basic algebra wrong here.

I was trying to do part 1 by solving (1/2)KE=PE

So, (1/2)(1/2)mv^2 = GMm/R
(1/4)v^2 = GM/R
v^2 = 4GM/R
and v=sqrt(4GM/R)

So in the process of trying to find the answer of part 1, I got close to the answer for part 2 (If I had made KE=PE), but now I'm just confused. Is the "1/2" in the equation for KE already accounting for this? Should I be looking at it like mv^2=PE?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinetic energy is one-half of potential energy. That means KE=1/2PE, not 1/2KE=PE. However, you shouldn't start off by assuming what you're trying to prove; that just leads to confusing logic. Instead, assume the satellite orbits at a radius R. Find its potential energy, find its kinetic energy, and you'll see that KE=1/2PE.
 
So just plug in a random mass and a random radius? I don't have any values to use... I'd need a mass, a radius... Which I could pick anything... But what about velocity? I can't just pick something there. And I can't find velocity without a change in distance and time.
 
Last edited:
crafty2288 said:
So just plug in a random mass and a random radius? I don't have any values to use... I'd need a mass, a radius... Which I could pick anything... But what about velocity? I can't just pick something there. And I can't find velocity without a change in distance and time.

Just keep your equations with the variables in them such as r and M. For the velocity, do you know what orbital velocity is equal to? Remember it is in circular orbit. What is the force on it?
 
zachzach said:
Just keep your equations with the variables in them such as r and M. For the velocity, do you know what orbital velocity is equal to? Remember it is in circular orbit. What is the force on it?

I just had to look that up, because I can't find it in the textbook chapter at all.

But, I found V=sqrt(GM/r)
So KE=(1/2)*m*(sqrtGM/r)^2 or (1/2)*m*(GM/r)

So basically that means
PE= -GMm/R
KE=(1/2) GMm/R


I think that's satisfactory for part 1, if I did that right. Because PE is negative, KE is positive, and KE is 1/2 PE.
Im not sure how to approach Part II though.

I think that KE=PE to escape earth... so...
(1/2)mv^2 = GMm/R
v^2 = 2GM/R
and v=sqrt(2GM/R)

But I'm supposed to find v=sqrt(2gR)...Where am I going wrong here? I think I am confused about what needs to happen to escape earth.
 
crafty2288 said:
I just had to look that up, because I can't find it in the textbook chapter at all.

But, I found V=sqrt(GM/r)



So KE=(1/2)*m*(sqrtGM/r)^2 or (1/2)*m*(GM/r)

So basically that means
PE= -GMm/R
KE=(1/2) GMm/R


I think that's satisfactory for part 1, if I did that right. Because PE is negative, KE is positive, and KE is 1/2 PE.



Im not sure how to approach Part II though.

I think that KE=PE to escape earth... so...
(1/2)mv^2 = GMm/R
v^2 = 2GM/R
and v=sqrt(2GM/R)

But I'm supposed to find v=sqrt(2gR)


...Where am I going wrong here?

Yep looks right to me for the first part. To get the orbital velocity all you do is set the force of gravity (GMm/r^2) equal to ma. But the acceleration is centripetal (a = v^2/r) since it is a circular orbit. Solve for v and voila.

For escape velocity it looks right as well. What does g equal in v=sqrt(2gR)?
 
zachzach said:
Yep looks right to me for the first part. To get the orbital velocity all you do is set the force of gravity (GMm/r^2) equal to ma. But the acceleration is centripetal (a = v^2/r) since it is a circular orbit. Solve for v and voila.

For escape velocity it looks right as well. What does g equal in v=sqrt(2gR)?

g is 9.8 ms/^2... But I'm not seeing how that makes it equal to v=sqrt(2GM/R)?
 
crafty2288 said:
g is 9.8 ms/^2... But I'm not seeing how that makes it equal to v=sqrt(2GM/R)?

This is only true on Earth's surface. But we also use it because it is a good approximation when near Earth's surface as well. How do you find g?
 
Oooooooook! g = GM/R^2

So v=sqrt(2gR)... v=sqrt(2(GM/R^2)R)...v=sqrt(2GM/R)

Success!

Much thanks. This is a study guide for an upcoming physics exam, so I really appreciate you helping me to understand where everything was coming from.
 
  • #10
Yup no problem ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 100 ·
4
Replies
100
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
807