Solving Gradient Problem (c): LHS ≠ RHS

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewtonApple
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gradient
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a vector calculus problem involving the divergence of a vector field and its implications. The original poster is attempting to show that the left-hand side (LHS) of an expression involving the vector \(\overrightarrow{r}\) and the gradient operator \(\nabla\) does not equal the right-hand side (RHS) involving the product of \(r\) and \(\nabla\).

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the calculation of the divergence of the vector \(\overrightarrow{r}\) and its implications for the LHS of the inequality. There are questions about the validity of the operations performed, particularly regarding the dot product of a vector and a scalar.

Discussion Status

Some participants have pointed out potential errors in the original calculations and questioned the notation used in the problem statement. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these calculations, with no clear consensus reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of possible misprints in the problem statement, and participants are discussing the notation used in the context of vector calculus, which may lead to confusion regarding the operations performed.

NewtonApple
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


image024.gif
[/B]
Solving part (c) which should be
\overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r)}\neq\left(r\nabla\right)r

2. Homework Equations


Let \nabla=\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}

and \overrightarrow{r}=x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}
r = \mid r\mid=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}

The Attempt at a Solution



Consider left side of the inequality.

Now \nabla.\overrightarrow{r}=<br /> (\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}<br /> ).\left(x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}\right)=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial z}{\partial z}=1+1+1=3

L.H.S. =\overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r})

L.H.S. = \left(\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right).3=3\overrightarrow{r}


Now consider right side of the inequality.

\left(r\nabla\right)=\left(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\right)\left(\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right)

\left(r\nabla\right) =\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=\hat{i}\frac{2x}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}\frac{2y}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}\frac{2z}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=<br /> \hat{i}x\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}y\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}z\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}

R.H.S. =r\left(r\nabla\right)=\left(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\right)\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}=\overrightarrow{r}

Hence L.H.S. \neq R.H.S.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
NewtonApple said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 77205 [/B]
Solving part (c) which should be
\overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r)}\neq\left(r\nabla\right)r
That still can't be right. See below.

Consider left side of the inequality.

Now \nabla.\overrightarrow{r}=<br /> (\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}<br /> ).\left(x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}\right)=\frac{\partial x}{\partial x}+\frac{\partial y}{\partial y}+\frac{\partial z}{\partial z}=1+1+1=3

L.H.S. =\overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r})

L.H.S. = \left(\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right).3=3\overrightarrow{r}
Your last line is incorrect. You found ##\nabla\cdot\vec{r} = 3##, so you should have ##\vec{r}\cdot(\nabla\cdot\vec{r}) = \vec{r}\cdot 3##, which doesn't make sense because you can't dot a vector with a scalar.
Now consider right side of the inequality.

\left(r\nabla\right)=\left(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\right)\left(\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\right)

\left(r\nabla\right) =\hat{i}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}\frac{\partial}{\partial y}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}\frac{\partial}{\partial z}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{\frac{1}{2}}
You can't change the order of ##r## and ##\nabla##. The expression on the RHS is equal to ##\nabla r##, not ##r \nabla##.

\left(r\nabla\right)=\hat{i}\frac{2x}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}\frac{2y}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}\frac{2z}{2}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=<br /> \hat{i}x\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{j}y\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}+\hat{k}z\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right)^{-\frac{1}{2}}

\left(r\nabla\right)=\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}
What you actually calculated is ##\nabla r = \hat{r}##. It's not for nothing, however, as you need this to correctly evaluate the righthand side.

R.H.S. =r\left(r\nabla\right)=\left(\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}\right)\frac{x\hat{i}+y\hat{j}+z\hat{k}}{\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}}=\overrightarrow{r}

Hence L.H.S. \neq R.H.S.
The RHS you started with was ##r\nabla r##. At the end, you incorrectly say it's ##r(r\nabla)##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NewtonApple
Thx Vela! I'll give it another try.

There is a misprint in the problem statement.
image024.gif

I think (c) part should be \overrightarrow{r}.(\nabla.\overrightarrow{r)}\neq\left(r\nabla\right)r
Are you OK with it?
 
No.
 
NewtonApple said:
##r = \mid r\mid=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}##
In the photocopied text, all occurrences of 'r' are in bold, implying vectors.
 
In your chapter 1 in the Chow book, under "Formulas involving ##\nabla## " , you find ##\nabla\cdot {\bf r} = 3## and ##({\bf A}\cdot \nabla){\bf r} = {\bf A}## for A any differentiable vector field function. Substituting ##{\bf A} = {\bf r}## gives ##({\bf r}\cdot \nabla){\bf r} = {\bf r}##.

##{\bf r} \cdot (\nabla\cdot {\bf r}) ## would be a vector dotted into a scalar. Doesn't make sense.

And in ##({\bf r} \nabla){\bf r} = {\bf r}## the ##({\bf r} \nabla){\bf r}## (without the ##\cdot## ) could be a matrix for all we know.

As in 1.18(b), mr Chow seems to be a bit sloppy, or at least inconsistent with his notation. Best I can make of it is that he wants you to prove that
##{\bf r} \; (\nabla\cdot {\bf r}) \ne ({\bf r} \cdot \nabla)\;{\bf r} ##, which by now should be a piece of cake for you :)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: NewtonApple

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K